Proceedings of Olkc 2007 – " Learning Fusion " Drawing the Boundaries of Codified Knowledge Transfer

The goal of this paper is to examine an instance of the codified knowledge transfer process in non-routine activities from the socio-organizational perspective. We examined knowledge codification, decodification and mechanisms to transfer knowledge considering two aspects: the role of context and the portion of tacit knowledge embedded in codified knowledge. The empirical evidence came from a higher education institution that used ‘course guidelines’ (codified knowledge) as part of its mass-education strategy. Findings indicated that different assumptions key stakeholders had regarding the nature of knowledge, the role of context, the portion of tacit elements contained in CK, and the codification decodification activities helped to explain the codification process. Moreover, the codification process was part of a wider process of commodification that attempted to create a knowledge product plausible of storage and distribution. This is a new form of organizing knowledge that involves dividing, codifying and replicating knowledge by third parties. The paradox of this situation is that, while the codification strategy implies in the separation of the processes of codification and decodification, the adequate decodification process needs integration between those two processes.

[1]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Introduction : Toward a Practice-Based View of Knowing and Learning in Organizations , 2003 .

[2]  R. W. Revans,et al.  The theory of practice in management , 1966 .

[3]  Linda Argote,et al.  Repositories of Knowledge in Franchise Organizations: Individual, Structural, and Technological , 2001 .

[4]  Barry Smith,et al.  Practical Knowledge: Outlines of a Theory of Traditions and Skills , 1988 .

[5]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[6]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Managing Codified Knowledge , 1999 .

[7]  John Geanakoplos,et al.  Common Knowledge , 1992, TARK.

[8]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[9]  Joanne Roberts.  From Know-how to Show-how? Questioning the Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[10]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[11]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[12]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[13]  M. Wood.  Mind the Gap? A Processual Reconsideration of Organizational Knowledge , 2002 .

[14]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[15]  J. Benders,et al.  Contested commodification: Consultancies and their struggle with new concept development , 2005 .

[16]  Dick Stenmark,et al.  Leveraging Tacit Organizational Knowledge , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  P. Alexander,et al.  Nurturing the seeds of transfer: a domain-specific perspective , 1999 .

[18]  Matthew Hall,et al.  Knowledge management and the limits of knowledge codification , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[19]  Pierre-André Mangolte,et al.  Articulation and codification of collective know-how in the steel industry: evidence from blast furnace control in France , 2003 .

[20]  P. Senge.  THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[21]  Kevin Downing,et al.  Context dependent learning: its value and impact for workplace education , 2006 .

[22]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[23]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[24]  Joanne Roberts.  Limits to Communities of Practice , 2006 .

[25]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Hilary McLellan,et al.  Situated Learning: Continuing the Conversation. , 1994 .

[27]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  If Nelson and Winter are only half right about tacit knowledge, which half? A Searlean critique of 'codification' , 2003 .

[28]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Do we really understand tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[29]  A. Prencipe,et al.  Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms , 2001 .

[30]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  The Transfer of Management Innovations from Japan , 1995 .

[31]  Fernando Olivera,et al.  Memory Systems In Organizations: An Empirical Investigation Of Mechanisms For Knowledge Collection, Storage And Access , 2000 .

[32]  Rudy L. Ruggles.  Tools for Knowledge Management: An Introduction , 1996 .

[33]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Codified-tacit and general-specific knowledge in the division of labour among firms: A study of the software industry , 2001 .

[34]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[35]  Nathalie Lazaric,et al.  How and why routines change: some lessons from the articulation of knowledge with ISO 9002 implementation in the food industry , 2001 .

[36]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[37]  Tony Huzzard,et al.  Communities of domination? Reconceptualising organisational learning and power , 2004 .

[38]  A. Edmondson.  Framing for Learning: Lessons in Successful Technology Implementation , 2003 .

[39]  Cognitive skills and their transfer: Discussion , 1987 .

[40]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  What is Organizational Knowledge , 2001 .

[41]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  Theory Building in Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[42]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[43]  A. Bryman,et al.  Business Research Methods , 2004 .

[44]  John Wilson,et al.  The "soft" dimension of organizational knowledge transfer , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[45]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities , 2001 .

[46]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[47]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Situated Knowledge and Learning in Dispersed Teams , 2002 .

[48]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[49]  M. Thompson,et al.  Placing Knowledge Management in Context , 2004 .

[50]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[51]  B. Marr,et al.  Intellectual capital at the crossroads: managing, measuring, and reporting of IC , 2004 .

[52]  Anil Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Management’s Social Dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel , 2000 .

[53]  Timothy Morris.  Asserting Property Rights: Knowledge Codification in the Professional Service Firm , 2001 .

[54]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[55]  R. Yin.  The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers , 1981 .

[56]  Laura Empson,et al.  Introduction: Knowledge Management in Professional Service Firms , 2001 .

[57]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[58]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Knowledge Codification, Process Routinization and the Creation of Organizational Capabilities: Post-Acquisition Management in the US Banking Industry , 1998 .

[59]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Organizational Learning: New Directions , 2002 .

[60]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Expert systems: aspects of and limitations to the codifiability of knowledge , 2001 .

[61]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  Knowing What You Don't Know? Discourses and Contradictions in Knowledge Management Research , 2004 .

[62]  Jill Adler.  Situated cognition and the learning of mathematics , 1998 .

[63]  Gabriel Szulanski.  The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[64]  Roy Suddaby,et al.  Colonizing Knowledge: Commodification as a Dynamic of Jurisdictional Expansion in Professional Service Firms , 2001 .

[65]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[66]  Mona V. Makhija,et al.  The Role Of Organizational Controls In Managing Knowledge , 2006 .

[67]  J. Spender.  COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FROM TACIT KNOWLEDGE? UNPACKING THE CONCEPT AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS. , 1993 .

[68]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[69]  R. Pea.  Socializing the knowledge transfer problem , 1987 .

[70]  J. C. Nyíri.  Tradition and practical knowledge , 1992 .

[71]  P. Cohendet,et al.  The Economics Of Knowledge: The Debate About Codification And Tacit Knowledge , 2000 .