Signal-Based AE Analysis

Approaches in recording and analyzing AE signals can be divided into two main groups: parameter-based (classical) and signal-based (quantitative) AE techniques. Both approaches are currently applied, with success for different applications, and it is useful to understand their differences, which should here be summarized in addition to the more detailed description of parameter-based techniques in Chap. 4. The reason that two approaches exist is related to the rapid developments in microelectronics over the last few decades. Previously, it was not possible to record and store a large number of waveforms (signals) over a sufficiently short period of time. Even though significant technical advances have been made in recent years, it is still not possible to use signal-based techniques to monitor large structures and buildings. In addition, the relatively high financial costs and the time required to apply modern signal-based techniques, are a reason why parameter-based techniques are still popular. Before the differences are described in detail, it should be emphasized that the discrepancies between the two approaches are becoming smaller. Some of the devices used for the classical AE technique are now able to store the waveforms of the detected AE signals, even though this is not the primary function of these devices. For applications using signal-based analysis techniques, equipment based on transient recorders is typically used. It is easy to apply custom software tools to extract AE parameters for statistical analyses of the data obtained with these instruments.

[1]  George E. Backus,et al.  Moment Tensors and other Phenomenological Descriptions of Seismic Sources—I. Continuous Displacements , 1976 .

[2]  Lindsay M. Linzer,et al.  Source parameters of acoustic emission events and scaling with mining‐induced seismicity , 2003 .

[3]  Marvin A. Hamstad Improved Signal-to-noise Wideband Acoustic/ultrasonic Contact Displacement Sensors for Wood and Polymers , 2007 .

[4]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[5]  The fate of the downgoing slab: A study of the moment tensors from body waves of complex deep-focus earthquakes , 1980 .

[6]  T. F. Drouillard Introduction to acoustic emission , 1988 .

[7]  E. Mori,et al.  Acoustic‐emission transducer and its absolute calibration , 1976 .

[8]  Y. Bar-Cohen,et al.  Polymer Piezoelectric Transducers for Ultrasonic NDE , 1996 .

[9]  H.-W. Reinhardt,et al.  Schallemissionsquellen automatisch lokalisieren : Entwicklung eines algorithmus , 1999 .

[10]  Ray Buland,et al.  The mechanics of locating earthquakes , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  M. Oncescu,et al.  Relative seismic moment tensor determination for Vrancea intermediate depth earthquakes , 1986 .

[12]  Christian U. Grosse,et al.  Localization and classification of fracture types in concrete with quantitative acoustic emission measurement techniques , 1997 .

[13]  Harold Berger,et al.  Nondestructive Testing Standards—A Review , 1977 .

[14]  T. F. Drouillard A history of acoustic emission , 1996 .

[15]  S. P. Shah,et al.  Parametric study of acoustic emission location using only four sensors , 1988 .

[16]  Christian U. Grosse,et al.  Relative moment tensor inversion applied to concrete fracture tests , 1996 .

[17]  D. Lockner,et al.  Quasi-static fault growth and shear fracture energy in granite , 1991, Nature.

[18]  Marvin A. Hamstad,et al.  Development of practical wideband high-fidelity acoustic emission sensors , 1995, Smart Structures.

[19]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Source study of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[20]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[21]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Assessing Damage in Corroded Reinforced Concrete Using Acoustic Emission , 2000 .

[22]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  A Student’s Guide to and Review of Moment Tensors , 1989 .

[23]  R. C. Mcmaster Nondestructive testing handbook , 1959 .

[24]  L. Linzer A Relative Moment Tensor Inversion Technique Applied to Seismicity Induced by Mining , 2005 .

[25]  A. McGarr,et al.  Moment tensors of ten witwatersrand mine tremors , 1992 .

[26]  S. Stanchits,et al.  Source analysis of acoustic emissions in Aue granite cores under symmetric and asymmetric compressive loads , 1998 .

[27]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Automated determination of first P-wave arrival and acoustic emission source location , 1991 .

[28]  Christian U. Grosse,et al.  Damage accumulation on deformed steel bar to concrete interaction detected by acoustic emission technique , 1996 .

[29]  S. Glaser,et al.  Body waves recorded inside an elastic half-space by an embedded, wideband velocity sensor , 1998 .

[30]  Joseph F Labuz,et al.  Damage mechanisms in stressed rock from acoustic emission , 1995 .

[31]  Howard J. Patton,et al.  Reference point equalization method for determining the source and path effects of surface waves , 1980 .

[32]  C. Langston,et al.  Moment tensor inversion of complex earthquakes , 1982 .

[33]  G. Kino Acoustic waves : devices, imaging, and analog signal processing , 1987 .

[34]  Dieter Baumann,et al.  A computer program for focal mechanism determination combining P and S wave data , 1969 .

[35]  T. Dahm,et al.  Relative moment tensor inversion based on ray theory: theory and synthetic tests , 1996 .

[36]  Stefan Köppel,et al.  Schallemissionsanalyse zur Untersuchung von Stahlbetontragwerken , 2002 .

[37]  Thomas M. Proctor More recent improvements on the NBS conical transducer , 1986 .

[38]  R. Paul Young,et al.  Moment tensor inversion of induced microseisnmic events: Evidence of non-shear failures in the -4 < M < -2 moment magnitude range , 1992 .

[39]  S Koppel,et al.  LOCALIZATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CRACKING MECHANISMS IN REINFORCED CONCRETE USING ACOUSTIC EMISSION ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[40]  Paul McIntire,et al.  Acoustic emission testing , 1987 .

[41]  Ari Ben-Menahem,et al.  Seismic waves and sources , 1981 .

[42]  H. Reinhardt,et al.  Acoustic Emission Data From Pull-Out Tests of Reinforced Concrete Analysed with Respect to Passive Us-Tomography , 1995 .

[43]  Josef Krautkrämer,et al.  Werkstoffprüfung mit Ultraschall , 1961 .

[44]  Masayasu Ohtsu,et al.  Determination of crack location, type and orientation ina concrete structures by acoustic emission , 1991 .

[45]  Christian U. Grosse,et al.  Quantitative zerstörungsfreie Prüfung von Baustoffen mittels Schallemissionsanalyse und Ultraschall , 1996 .

[46]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Stress Wave Attenuation in Cement-Based Materials , 1995 .

[47]  L. Geiger Herdbestimmung bei Erdbeben aus den Ankunftszeiten , 1910 .

[48]  M. Enoki,et al.  Theory and analysis of deformation moment tensor due to microcracking , 1988, International Journal of Fracture.

[49]  D. L. Hykes,et al.  Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation , 1985 .

[50]  G. A. Wiebols,et al.  Digital location of seismic events by an underground network of seismometers using the arrival times of compressional waves , 1974 .

[51]  Wolfgang Sachse,et al.  Quantitative acoustic emission and failure mechanics of composite materials , 1987 .

[52]  Masayasu Ohtsu,et al.  Simplified moment tensor analysis and unified decomposition of acoustic emission source: Application to in situ hydrofracturing test , 1991 .

[53]  A. Pollock Acoustic emission - 2: Acoustic emission amplitudes , 1973 .