Automated Quality Assessment of Cardiac MR Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Image quality assessment (IQA) is crucial in large-scale population imaging so that high-throughput image analysis can extract meaningful imaging biomarkers at scale. Specifically, in this paper, we address a seemingly basic yet unmet need: the automatic detection of missing (apical and basal) slices in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) scans, which is currently performed by tedious visual assessment. We cast the problem as classification tasks, where the bottom and top slices are tested for the presence of typical basal and apical patterns. Inspired by the success of deep learning methods, we train Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to construct a set of discriminative features. We evaluated our approach on a subset of the UK Biobank datasets. Precision and Recall figures for detecting missing apical slice (MAS) (81.61 % and 88.73 %) and missing basal slice (MBS) (74.10 % and 88.75 %) are superior to other state-of-the-art deep learning architectures. Cross-dataset experiments show the generalization ability of our approach.

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment Using Joint Statistics of Gradient Magnitude and Laplacian Features , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Katarzyna Krupa,et al.  Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2015, Polish journal of radiology.

[3]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Quality-aware images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Steffen E Petersen,et al.  The association of left atrial volume with age, ethnicity and cardiovascular risk factors in men and women: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) , 2016, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[5]  E. Nagel,et al.  Quantification in cardiac MRI: advances in image acquisition and processing , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[6]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  P. Bhagirath,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: artefacts for clinicians , 2014, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[8]  Juerg Schwitter,et al.  Quality assessment of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the setting of the European CMR registry: description and validation of standardized criteria , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[10]  P. Matthews,et al.  Imaging in population science: cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank - rationale, challenges and approaches , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[11]  Pedro F Ferreira,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[12]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[13]  Honglak Lee,et al.  Convolutional deep belief networks for scalable unsupervised learning of hierarchical representations , 2009, ICML '09.

[14]  P. Matthews,et al.  UK Biobank’s cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[15]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Shuicheng Yan,et al.  Automatic Feature Learning for Glaucoma Detection Based on Deep Learning , 2015, MICCAI.