Organizational responses to uncertainty in the airline industry: Changes in patterns of communication networks

Changing environmental conditions introduce uncertainty into organizational operations, and airlines respond in various ways. Scholars traditionally explore responses to environmental uncertainty by drawing upon theories of communication networks, coordination, organizational resilience, and high reliability organizing. Yet, the research has competing communication predictions, which makes planning and designing organizational responses challenging, as the level and type of uncertainty changes over time. Research also does not address variations in responses across different groups of employees. Using longitudinal network data from the United Airlines operations tower in Newark Airport (USA), this research examines communication for the purpose of relational coordination in a dynamically adaptive organizational network. Results reveal different patterns of organizational communication as different employee groups (frontline, cross-functional boundary spanners, and managers) face varying conditions of uncertainty. This paper concludes with theoretical contributions and practical recommendations for managing complex communication networks to respond to dynamic conditions of uncertainty in the airline operations settings.

[1]  Muhammad Aftab Alam,et al.  Techno-stress and productivity: Survey evidence from the aviation industry , 2016 .

[2]  J. David Johnson.  Managing Knowledge Networks , 2009 .

[3]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Free to Be Trusted? Organizational Constraints on Trust in Boundary Spanners , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[4]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[5]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[6]  Varghese P. George,et al.  Relational data in organzational settings: an introductory note for using AGNI and netgraphs to analyze nodes, relationships, partitions and boundaries , 1993 .

[7]  Carlos Martin-Rios,et al.  Why do firms seek to share human resource management knowledge? The importance of inter-firm networks , 2014 .

[8]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[9]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[10]  K. Roberts.  Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[11]  William B. Stevenson,et al.  Balancing Ties: Boundary Spanning and Influence in the Organization's Extended Network of Communication , 2001 .

[12]  J. Carroll,et al.  Moving Beyond Normal Accidents and High Reliability Organizations: A Systems Approach to Safety in Complex Systems , 2009 .

[13]  Deborah L. Gladstein,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Threat: The Tycoon Game , 1985 .

[14]  R. Macário,et al.  Can flexibility make the difference to an airport's productivity? An assessment using cluster analysis , 2015 .

[15]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Categorical attribute based centrality: E-I and G-F centrality , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[16]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[17]  Joseph T. Banas,et al.  Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects , 2002 .

[18]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[19]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[20]  Peter J. Bruce.  Understanding Decision-making Processes in Airline Operations Control , 2016 .

[21]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[22]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[23]  Peter J. Bruce,et al.  Regulating interactions across multiple centres of control an airline operations control perspective , 2013 .

[24]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[25]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Impact of relational coordination on job satisfaction and quality outcomes: a study of nursing homes , 2008 .

[26]  Saul A. Rubinstein.  The Impact of Co-Management on Quality Performance: The Case of the Saturn Corporation , 2000 .

[27]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[29]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[31]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[32]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Relational Bureaucracy: Structuring Reciprocal Relationships into Roles , 2012 .

[33]  Markus Franke,et al.  What comes next after recession? – Airline industry scenarios and potential end games , 2011 .

[34]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Doing No Harm: Enabling, Enacting, and Elaborating a Culture of Safety in Health Care , 2010 .

[35]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  The Southwest Airlines Way : Using the Power of Relationships to Achieve High Performance , 2002 .

[36]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[37]  Leigh Weiss,et al.  Coordination Networks within and Across Organizations: A Multi-Level Framework , 2004 .

[38]  L. Argote,et al.  To centralize or not to centralize: The effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance , 1989 .

[39]  A. Woolley,et al.  Multiple Team Membership: a Theoretical Model of its Effects on Productivity and Learning for Individuals and Teams , 2011 .

[40]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects , 2002 .

[41]  George J. Siomkos,et al.  Managing airline disasters , 2000 .

[42]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Supervisory Span, Relational Coordination and Flight Departure Performance , 2001 .

[43]  Sean A. Way,et al.  From bureaucratic forms towards team-based knowledge work systems: implications for human resource management , 2009 .

[44]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. , 1985 .

[45]  Carlos Martin-Rios,et al.  Knowledge flow from the top: the importance of teamwork structure in team sports , 2014 .

[46]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[47]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  J. A. Marrone.  Team Boundary Spanning: A Multilevel Review of Past Research and Proposals for the Future , 2010 .

[49]  Greg J. Bamber,et al.  Up in the Air: How Airlines Can Improve Performance by Engaging Their Employees , 2009 .

[50]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Stress , 1991 .