Valence Creation and the German Applicative: the Inherent Semantics of Linking Patterns

We provide a unified account of semantic effects observable in attested examples of the German applicative (‘be-’) construction, e.g. Rollstuhlfahrer Poul Sehachsen aus Kopenhagen will den 1997 erschienenen Wegweiser Handiguide Europa fortfuhren und zusammen mit Movado Berlin berollen (‘Wheelchair user Poul Schacksen from Copenhagen wants to continue the guide ‘Handiguide Europe’, which came out in 1997, and roll Berlin together with Movado.’). We argue that these effects do not come from lexico-semantic operations on ‘input’ verbs, but are instead the products of a reconciliation procedure in which the meaning of the verb is integrated into the event-structure schema denoted by the applicative construction. We analyze the applicative pattern as an argument-structure construction, in terms of Goldberg (1995). We contrast this approach with that of Brinkmann (1997), in which properties associated with the applicative pattern (e.g. omissibility of the theme argument, holistic interpretation of the goal argument, and planar construal of the location argument) are attributed to general semantico-pragmatic principles. We undermine the generality of the principles as stated, and assert that these properties are instead construction-particular. We further argue that the constructional account provides an elegant model of the valence-creation and valence-augmentation functions of the prefix. We describe the constructional semantics as prototype-based: diverse implications of fee-predications, including iteration, transfer, affectedness, intensity and saturation, derive via regular patterns of semantic extension from the topological concept of coverage.

[1]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1991 .

[2]  Eve Sweetser Metaphorical Models of Thought and Speech: A Comparison of Historical Directions and Metaphorical Mappings in the Two Domains , 1987 .

[3]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[4]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  Cause and the structure of verbs , 1997 .

[5]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure , 1991, Cognition.

[6]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[7]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[8]  Beth L. Losiewicz The effect of frequency on linguistic morphology , 1992 .

[9]  S. Löbner,et al.  Wahr neben Falsch : duale Operatoren als die Quantoren natürlicher Sprache , 1990 .

[10]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  When Nouns Surface as Verbs , 1979 .

[11]  Arnold M. Zwicky,et al.  What's become of derivations? Defaults and Invocations , 1989 .

[12]  Laura A. Michaelis A case of constructional polysemy in Latin , 1994 .

[13]  Ray Jackendoff Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[14]  Balthasar Bickel,et al.  Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation , 1997 .

[15]  Laura A. Michaelis On deviant case-marking in Latin , 1992 .

[16]  Josef Ruppenhofer,et al.  Beyond alternations : a constructional model of the German applicative pattern , 2001 .

[17]  Michael Herweg,et al.  A Critical Examination of Two Classical Approaches to Aspect , 1991, J. Semant..

[18]  Joan Bresnan Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal Grammar. , 1994 .

[19]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[20]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  (1) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms; and , 1987 .

[21]  C. Tenny Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness , 1987 .

[22]  James F. Allen,et al.  Two Constraints on Speech Act Ambiguity , 1989, ACL.

[23]  Van Valin,et al.  Advances in role and reference grammar , 1992 .

[24]  DIETER WUNDERLICH,et al.  An investigation of lexical composition: the case of German be- verbs , 1987 .

[25]  U. Brinkmann,et al.  The locative alternation: its structure and acquisition , 1995 .

[26]  Ray Jackendoff TWISTIN' THE NIGHT AWAY , 1997 .

[27]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Blending as a Central Process of Grammar , 1996 .

[28]  Revere D. Perkins,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar , 1994 .

[29]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Linking constructions vs. linking rules: evidence from French , 1993 .

[30]  Eve Sweetser From Etymology To Pragmatics , 1990 .

[31]  Hana Filip,et al.  Aspect and the Semantics of Noun Phrases , 1994 .

[32]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[33]  Laurence R. Horn A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[34]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Divergence and Apparent Convergence in the Development of Yet and Still , 1982 .

[35]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[36]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[37]  Gisela Zifonun Hartmut Günther: Das System der Verben mit BE- in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart : ein Beitrag zur Struktur des Lexikons der deutschen Grammatik, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1974 (Linguistische Arbeiten ; 23), 279 S. , 1976 .

[38]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[39]  Terry Regier,et al.  A Preliminary Study of the Semantics of Reduplication , 1994 .

[40]  B. Levin,et al.  What to do with theta-roles , 1986 .

[41]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[42]  Gary F. Marcus,et al.  German Inflection: The Exception That Proves the Rule , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  T. Odlin Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[44]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation , 1989 .

[45]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Regular and Irregular Morphology and the Psychological Status of Rules of Grammar , 1991 .

[46]  Ursula Brinkmann The locative alternation in German , 1997 .

[47]  David Lebeaux The Feature [+affected] and the Formation of the Passive , 1988 .

[48]  Sally Rice Towards a cognitive model of transitivity , 1987 .

[49]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora , 1986 .

[50]  DIETER WUNDERLICH TOWARDS A LEXICON-BASED THEORY OF AGREEMENT , 1994 .

[51]  G. Lakoff The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? , 1990 .

[52]  Arnold M. Zwicky,et al.  Dealing Out Meaning: Fundamentals of Syntactic Constructions , 1994 .

[53]  Alex Alsina,et al.  The syntax of applicatives in Chicheŵa: Problems for a theta theoretic asymmetry , 1990 .

[54]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  The relation of grammar to cognition , 1986 .

[55]  D. Wunderlich How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? , 1991 .

[56]  Hans-Werner Eroms Be-Verb und Präpositionalphrase : ein Beitrag zur Grammatik der deutschen Verbalpräfixe , 1980 .

[57]  C. Fillmore The case for case reopened , 1977 .

[58]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[59]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[60]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[61]  Rainer Schulze,et al.  Understanding the Lexicon: Meaning, Sense and World Knowledge in Lexical Semantics , 1990 .

[62]  J. L. Morgan,et al.  Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts. Technical Report No. 52. , 1977 .

[63]  Robert D. Van Valin,et al.  Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar , 1984 .

[64]  Laura A. Michaelis,et al.  TOWARD A CONSTRUCTION-BASED THEORY OF LANGUAGE FUNCTION : THE CASE OF NOMINAL EXTRAPOSITION , 1996 .

[65]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  The Relationships between Verbs and Constructions , 1997 .

[66]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Frames and the semantics of understanding , 1985 .

[67]  R. Langacker Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites , 1987 .

[68]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .