The i100-index, i1000-index and i10, 000-index: expansion and fortification of the Google Scholar h-index for finer-scale citation descriptions and researcher classification

[1]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”! , 2018, Scientometrics.

[2]  Lei Wang,et al.  Which h-index? An exploration within the Web of Science , 2020, Scientometrics.

[3]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Characterizing and Modeling Citation Dynamics , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  Brent Thoma,et al.  Using Google Scholar to track the scholarly output of research groups , 2019, Perspectives on Medical Education.

[5]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Mean values of skewed distributions in the bibliometric assessment of research units , 2020, Scientometrics.

[6]  Björn Brembs,et al.  Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Jorge E. Hirsch,et al.  hα: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific leadership , 2018, Scientometrics.

[8]  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez,et al.  Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics , 2018, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[9]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days , 2018, Nature.

[10]  M. Koyle,et al.  Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?-a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology. , 2019, Journal of pediatric urology.

[11]  Francesca R. Jensenius,et al.  The Benefits and Pitfalls of Google Scholar , 2018, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[12]  M. Kalcıoğlu,et al.  Evaluation of the academic productivity of the top 100 worldwide physicians in the field of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery using the Google Scholar h-index as the bibliometrics ranking system , 2018, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[13]  Martin Schumacher,et al.  The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[14]  Kevin W Boyack,et al.  A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field , 2019, PLoS biology.

[15]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Reflections on recent developments of the h-index and h-type indices , 2008 .

[16]  AFFAN YASIN,et al.  On Using Grey Literature and Google Scholar in Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering , 2020, IEEE Access.

[17]  Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al.  Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[18]  Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al.  Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions , 2019, Scientometrics.

[19]  Liz Allen,et al.  Alternative Perspectives on Impact: The Potential of ALMs and Altmetrics to Inform Funders about Research Impact , 2014, PLoS biology.

[20]  Maziar Montazerian,et al.  A new parameter for (normalized) evaluation of H-index: countries as a case study , 2019, Scientometrics.