Two-stage nested optimization-based uncertainty propagation method for model calibration

Model calibration is the procedure that adjusts the unknown parameters in order to fit the model to experimental data and improve predictive capability. However, it is difficult to implement the procedure because of the aleatory uncertainty. In this paper, a new method of model calibration based on uncertainty propagation is investigated. The calibration process is described as an optimization problem. A two-stage nested uncertainty propagation method is proposed to resolve this problem. Monte Carlo Simulation method is applied for the inner loop to propagate the aleatory uncertainty. Optimization method is applied for the outer loop to propagate the epistemic uncertainty. The optimization objective function is the consistency between the result of the inner loop and the experimental data. Thus, different consistency measurement methods for unary output and multivariate outputs are proposed as the optimization objective function. Finally, the thermal challenge problem is given to validate the reasonableness and effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  Hans-Georg Stark,et al.  Variance based uncertainty principles and minimum uncertainty samplings , 2013, Appl. Math. Lett..

[2]  Ming Yang,et al.  Knowledge-based method for the validation of complex simulation models , 2010, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[3]  Jane M. Booker,et al.  An evolution of uncertainty assessment and quantification , 2011, Sci. Iran..

[4]  Kevin J. Dowding,et al.  Multivariate approach to the thermal challenge problem , 2008 .

[5]  Hans Janssen,et al.  Monte-Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and sampling convergence , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Model validation under epistemic uncertainty , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Ying Xiong,et al.  A better understanding of model updating strategies in validating engineering models , 2009 .

[8]  Robert G. Sargent,et al.  Verification and validation of simulation models , 2013, Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference.

[9]  Szu Hui Ng,et al.  A sequential approach for stochastic computer model calibration and prediction , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  James O. Berger,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of the thermal challenge problem , 2008 .

[11]  W. Oberkampf,et al.  Model validation and predictive capability for the thermal challenge problem , 2008 .

[12]  Laura Painton Swiler,et al.  Calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis: What's what , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Kevin J. Dowding,et al.  Formulation of the thermal problem , 2008 .

[15]  Richard E. Nance,et al.  Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation , 2002, Oper. Res..

[16]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Kathleen V. Diegert,et al.  Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Multivariate significance testing and model calibration under uncertainty , 2008 .

[19]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[20]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Ideas underlying the Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing , 2011 .

[22]  Paul D. Arendt,et al.  Quantification of model uncertainty: Calibration, model discrepancy, and identifiability , 2012 .

[23]  Thomas L. Paez,et al.  Random Vibrations: Theory and Practice , 1995 .

[24]  Larry C. Andrews,et al.  Random Data Analysis , 2012 .

[25]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists , 1978 .

[26]  Gabiccini Marco,et al.  歯車歯面トポグラフィー修正用機械調整の同定について(DETC2011-47727) , 2012 .