Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients

OBJECTIVES:To investigate attitudes among primary care physicians and potential patients concerning “virtual” and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.METHODS:We sent 1000 questionnaires to primary care physicians by electronic or postal mail and administered 400 to potential patients. Questionnaires contained progressively detailed information about the tests and asked for choices based on information presented.RESULTS:One hundred eight-eight primary care physicians and 323 potential patients were included. Results indicated the following: 76.6% of potential patients and 47.3% of physicians initially preferred virtual colonoscopy because of its noninvasive nature; 23.6% of potential patients and 52.9% of physicians valued the ability of conventional colonoscopy to visualize the mucosa directly; and 67.4% of potential patients and 51.6% of physicians preferred virtual colonoscopy because it does not require sedation. Considering all information, most potential patients preferred virtual to conventional colonoscopy (60.2% vs 25.7%), whereas more physicians preferred conventional to virtual colonoscopy (44.9% vs 30.3%). Additionally, 82.3% of potential patients would comply more with recommendations for colorectal cancer screening, and 61.7% of physicians would refer more patients for screening, if virtual colonoscopy was available.CONCLUSIONS:Potential patients preferred virtual to conventional colonoscopy, whereas physicians favored conventional colonoscopy. Physicians placed more importance on the ability of conventional colonoscopy to visualize the mucosa directly, the opportunity for therapy, and cost. Potential patients were more encouraged than physicians by the availability of virtual colonoscopy for improving participation in colorectal cancer screening.

[1]  J. Debatin,et al.  Faecal tagging to avoid colonic cleansing before MRI colonography , 1999, The Lancet.

[2]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  B McNoe,et al.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy for colorectal screening: a randomized trial of performance and acceptability. , 1995, Cancer detection and prevention.

[4]  Lorraine Parker Collecting data the e-mail way , 1992 .

[5]  A. Zauber,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993 .

[6]  A. Hara,et al.  Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. , 1997, Radiology.

[7]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Peter Bauerfeind,et al.  Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? , 1999, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  N. Kreiger,et al.  Improvement in cumulative response rates following implementation of a financial incentive. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  S. Vernon,et al.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  R. Mendelson,et al.  Patient acceptance of virtual colonoscopy. , 2000, Endoscopy.

[12]  D A Redelmeier,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  A. Deehan,et al.  The effect of cash and other financial inducements on the response rate of general practitioners in a national postal study. , 1997, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.