Modeling human lane keeping control in highway driving with validation by naturalistic data

This paper considers two models of steering control relevant to lane-keeping during normal driving. The first is well-known from the literature and uses linear feedback. To test whether the model is capable of representing real-world driving under conditions of lane-keeping with low workload, parameter fitting is carried out using naturalistic driving data (NDD). It is found that the model can fit the NDD quite well, and that two of the three control parameters may be estimated in a consistent and repeatable way. The lack of fit in the third parameter is explained by the recognition that lane-center tracking does not occur in practice; hence response to lane boundaries is considered more relevant. However the instability of the resulting closed-loop controller calls into question the validity of the linear model. Further, it is found that the linear model does not adequately represent the intermittent pulse-like qualities of real-world steering control. Based on these considerations, a second model is formulated and initial comparisons with NDD are presented. It is proposed that the new model may inherently take account of workload demands, and is therefore relevant to issues of visual attention allocation during driving under reduced workload.

[1]  Michael Land,et al.  Which parts of the road guide steering? , 1995, Nature.

[2]  Adam D Blankespoor,et al.  Yaw rate error: a dynamic measure of lane keeping control performance for the retrospective analysis of naturalistic driving data , 2009 .

[3]  Huei Peng,et al.  An adaptive lateral preview driver model , 2005 .

[4]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Driver distraction : a review of the literature , 2007 .

[5]  Richard J. Hanowski,et al.  Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations , 2009 .

[6]  Erwin R. Boer,et al.  Development of a steering entropy method for evaluating driver workload , 1999 .

[7]  David H. Weir,et al.  Dynamics of driver vehicle steering control , 1970 .

[8]  Trent Victor,et al.  Sweden-Michigan Naturalistic Field Operational Test (SeMiFOT), Phase 1: WP5 Evaluation of Methodology. Final Report , 2010 .

[9]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Road Departure Crash Warning System Field Operational Test: Methodology and Results. Volume 1: Technical Report , 2006 .

[10]  Hong Guan,et al.  Modelling of Driver/Vehicle Directional Control System , 1993 .

[11]  David H. Weir,et al.  Measurement of Driver-Vehicle Multiloop Response Properties with a Single Disturbance Input , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  David Shinar,et al.  Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Charles C. MacAdam,et al.  Understanding and Modeling the Human Driver , 2003 .

[14]  John A. Michon,et al.  A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know , 1985 .

[15]  Jim P. Stimpson,et al.  Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[16]  Rob Gray,et al.  A Two-Point Visual Control Model of Steering , 2004, Perception.

[17]  Edmund Donges,et al.  A Two-Level Model of Driver Steering Behavior , 1978 .

[18]  D. E Haigney,et al.  Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes , 2000 .

[19]  P Fancher,et al.  Intelligent Cruise Control Field Operational Test , 1997 .

[20]  David H. Weir,et al.  New Results in Driver Steering Control Models , 1977 .

[21]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Human dynamics in man-machine systems , 1980, Autom..

[22]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .