Household-level transition methodology towards sustainable material footprints

This paper presents a new household-level methodology for transition towards sustainability. The methodology includes measuring the resource use of households on a micro level, testing relevant measures towards a one-planet resource use, and developing mainstreaming options in co-operation with households and providers of services, products, and infrastructures. We use the MIPS (Material Input Per unit of Service) method to calculate the use of natural resources and concentrate on the material footprint as an aggregated indicator for the overall use of material resources. With HST (Household-level Sustainability Transition) methodology, we extend the material footprint methodology from just measuring household resource use to developing visions, conducting experiments, as well as learning and upscaling, all of which contribute to the whole Transition-Enabling Cycle. Results from the first application of the HST methodology on five households in Jyvaskyla, Finland, show that it is possible to achieve a significantly more sustainable level of consumption by a relatively few changes in everyday living. Achieving a one-planet use of material resources, however, also requires systemic changes.

[1]  Michael Ritthoff,et al.  Calculating MIPS : resource productivity of products and services , 2002 .

[2]  H. Schütz,et al.  Rationale for and Interpretation of Economy‐Wide Materials Flow Analysis and Derived Indicators , 2003 .

[3]  T. Graedel,et al.  Criticality of non-fuel minerals: a review of major approaches and analyses. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[5]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Studying Well-being and its Environmental Impacts: A Case Study of Minimum Income Receivers in Finland , 2013 .

[6]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  Indicators for environmentally sustainable household consumption , 2001 .

[7]  Holger Rohn,et al.  Resource productivity in 7 steps: How to develop eco-innovative products and services and improve their material footprint , 2009 .

[8]  R. Almond,et al.  Living planet report 2012: Biodiversity, biocapacity and better choices , 2012 .

[9]  Kersty Hobson,et al.  Competing Discourses of Sustainable Consumption: Does the 'Rationalisation of Lifestyles' Make Sense? , 2002 .

[10]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Resource use of low-income households--approach for defining a decent lifestyle? , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Stefan Giljum,et al.  Developing targets for global resource use , 2015 .

[12]  Uwe Schneidewind,et al.  Zur Transformation des Energiesektors – ein Blick aus der Perspektive der Transition- Forschung , 2012 .

[13]  Johannes Buhl,et al.  Microfoundations for Sustainable Growth with Eco-Intelligent Product Service-Arrangements , 2013 .

[14]  Maria J. Welfens,et al.  MAIA : Einführung in die Material-Intensitäts-Analyse nach dem MIPS-Konzept , 1998 .

[15]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  MANAGING TRANSITIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[16]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  The Limits to Transforming the Environment and the Limits to Sociological Knowledge , 2010 .

[17]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  Complexity and Transition Management , 2009 .

[18]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Household MIPS : natural resource consumption of Finnish households and its reduction , 2008 .

[19]  India U.S. Consulate Mumbai 2014 Press Release , 2014 .

[20]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[21]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  Procedures and criteria to develop and evaluate household sustainable consumption indicators , 2012 .

[22]  A. Rip,et al.  Technological Change. In: Rayner S., Malone E.L. (editors). , 1998 .

[23]  Anna R. Davies,et al.  Towards sustainable household consumption: exploring a practice oriented, participatory backcasting approach for sustainable home heating practices in Ireland , 2013 .

[24]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[25]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Visions of a sustainable resource use , 2009 .

[26]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Material Footprint of Low-Income Households in Finland—Consequences for the Sustainability Debate , 2012 .

[27]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[28]  Kirsten S. Wiebe,et al.  Economic effects of peak oil , 2012 .

[29]  Satu Lähteenoja,et al.  Low-carbon futures and sustainable lifestyles: A backcasting scenario approach , 2014 .

[30]  Vilja Varho,et al.  The use, non-use and misuse of indicators in sustainability assessment and communication , 2013 .

[31]  F. Geels The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[32]  Stewart Barr,et al.  Environmental Action in the Home: Investigating the 'Value-Action' Gap , 2006 .

[33]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Europe s resource use : basic trends, global and sectoral patterns and environmental and socioeconomic impacts , 2009 .

[34]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[35]  S. Giljum,et al.  Overconsumption? Our use of the world's natural resources , 2009 .

[36]  M.R.M. Crul,et al.  Engaging beneficiaries of sustainable renovation – exploration of design-led participatory approaches , 2015 .

[37]  Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek,et al.  Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? : MIPS-das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften , 1994 .

[38]  A. Nissinen,et al.  An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and material flows caused by the Finnish economy using the ENVIMAT model , 2011 .

[39]  H. Haberl,et al.  Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century , 2009 .

[40]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Sustainable Resource Management , 2009 .

[41]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[42]  Maria Ritola,et al.  Scenarios for sustainable lifestyles Pathways toward a positive future , 2013 .

[43]  O. Mont,et al.  The Impacts of Household Consumption and Options for Change , 2010 .

[44]  Senja Laakso Onko elämä perusturvan varassa kestävää? : Ympäristövara ekologisesti ja sosiaalisesti kestävän kulutuksen tarkastelussa , 2011 .

[45]  Holger Rohn,et al.  Eight Tons of Material Footprint—Suggestion for a Resource Cap for Household Consumption in Finland , 2014 .

[46]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Key Elements for Economy-wide Sustainable Resource Management , 2011 .

[47]  R. Ayres,et al.  Production, Consumption, and Externalities , 1969 .

[48]  Gert Spaargaren,et al.  The ecological modernization of production and consumption , 1997 .

[49]  K. Halada,et al.  Forecasting of the Consumption of Metals up to 2050 , 2007 .

[50]  D. Loorbach Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[51]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Learning about and involving users in energy saving on the local level , 2013 .

[52]  Karoline Augenstein,et al.  Analyzing a transition to a sustainability-oriented science system in Germany , 2012 .

[53]  Artti Juutinen,et al.  Energy consumption and savings: A survey-based study of Finnish households , 2013 .

[54]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life , 2010 .

[55]  Satu Lähteenoja,et al.  From Global Champions to Local Loops : Sustainable Lifestyles in Europe 2050 , 2013 .

[56]  O. Mont,et al.  Sustainable lifestyles 2050: stakeholder visions, emerging practices and future research , 2014 .

[57]  Anna J. Wieczorek,et al.  Understanding industrial transformation: Views from different disciplines , 2006 .

[58]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .