Corporate environmentalism and environmental innovation.

Several papers have explored the effect of tighter environmental standards on environmental innovation. While mandatory regulation remains the central tenet of US environmental policy, the regulatory landscape has changed since the early 1990s with the increased recourse by federal and state agencies to corporate environmentalism--voluntary pollution prevention (P2) by firms--to achieve environmental improvements. We therefore estimate the effects of voluntary P2 activities on the patenting of environmental technologies by a sample of manufacturing firms. With our panel data of 352 firms over the 1991-2000 period, we adopt an instrumental variable Poisson framework to account for the count nature of patents and the endogeneity of the P2 adoption decision. Our results indicate that the adoption of voluntary P2 activities in the manufacturing sector has led to a statistically and economically significant increase in the number of environmental patents, suggesting that corporate environmentalism can act as a catalyst for investments in cleaner technologies. Our findings are internationally relevant given the increasing ubiquity of corporate environmentalism in both developed and developing economies.

[1]  D. Barnes,et al.  Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health risk assessments. , 1988, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  Robert Innes,et al.  Environmental innovation and environmental performance , 2010 .

[3]  Robert Innes,et al.  Do Voluntary Pollution Reduction Programs (VPRs) Spur Innovation in Environmental Technology , 2006 .

[4]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study , 1996, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[5]  Jeffrey T. Macher,et al.  Experience and scale and scope economies: Trade-offs and performance in development. , 2006 .

[6]  James G. MacKinnon,et al.  Transforming the Dependent Variable in Regression Models , 1990 .

[7]  J. Horbach Determinants of Environmental Innovation - New Evidence from German Panel Data Sources , 2006 .

[8]  Donna Ramirez Harrington Two-stage adoption of different types of pollution prevention (P2) activities , 2012 .

[9]  Robert Innes,et al.  Inducing Innovation in the Environmental Technology of Oligopolistic Firms , 2003 .

[10]  Nick Johnstone,et al.  Environmental Policy Design and the Fragmentation of International Markets for Innovation , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  Jay P. Shimshack,et al.  Enforcement and over-compliance , 2007 .

[12]  W. Gray,et al.  Compliance and Enforcement: Air Pollution Regulation in the U.S. Steel Industry , 1996 .

[13]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  The effectiveness of voluntary environmental initiatives , 2009 .

[14]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: Levels of adoption and contribution of the climate challenge program to the reduction of carbon dioxide , 2000 .

[15]  Richard S. Higgins,et al.  Raising Rivals’ Costs , 2014 .

[16]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[17]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[18]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? : Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 program , 1996 .

[19]  Stephen R. Finger,et al.  Does industry self-regulation reduce pollution? Responsible Care in the chemical industry , 2013 .

[20]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[21]  William H. McGuire The effect of ISO 14001 on environmental regulatory compliance in China , 2014 .

[22]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  Voluntary Environmental Programs: A Comparative Perspective. , 2012 .

[23]  M. Khanna,et al.  Reassessment of the Impact of the EPA’s Voluntary 33/50 Program on Toxic Releases , 2012, Land Economics.

[24]  J. S. Silva,et al.  Endogeneity in Count Data Models: An Application to Demand for Health Care , 1997 .

[25]  N. Khanna,et al.  Can voluntary pollution prevention programs fulfill their promises? Further evidence from the EPA's 33/50 Program , 2007 .

[26]  S. Gamper-Rabindran Did the EPA's voluntary industrial toxics program reduce emissions? A GIS analysis of distributional impacts and by-media analysis of substitution , 2006 .

[27]  Anna Alberini,et al.  The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: which firms participate and why? , 2000 .

[28]  Donna Ramirez Harrington,et al.  Innovation under the Climate Wise program , 2013 .

[29]  Abdoul G. Sam,et al.  Do voluntary pollution reduction programs (VPRs) spur or deter environmental innovation? Evidence from 33/50 , 2013 .

[30]  Lily Hsueh Beyond regulations: industry voluntary ban in arsenic use. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  B. Laplante,et al.  Environmental Inspections and Emissions of the Pulp and Paper Industry in Quebec , 1996 .

[32]  D. Popp,et al.  Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts , 2008 .

[33]  J. Hamilton Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data , 1995 .

[34]  William A. Pizer,et al.  Instrument Choice for Environmental Protection When Technological Innovation is Endogenous , 2003 .

[35]  Lawrence J. White,et al.  Innovation in pollution control , 1986 .

[36]  Smita B. Brunnermeier,et al.  Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[37]  Abdoul G. Sam,et al.  Voluntary Pollution Reduction Programs, Environmental Management, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Study , 2009, Land Economics.

[38]  B. Laplante,et al.  Incentives for Pollution Control: Regulation or Information? , 2002 .

[39]  Chulho Jung,et al.  Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives , 1996 .

[40]  R. Innes,et al.  Self-Policing Statutes: Do They Reduce Pollution and Save Regulatory Costs? , 2013 .

[41]  Scott Milliman,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Reply , 1992 .

[42]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms , 1999 .

[43]  Christopher S. Decker,et al.  Voluntary Environmental Investment and Responsive Regulation , 2006 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[45]  Abdoul G. Sam,et al.  1 Voluntary Pollution Reductions and the Enforcement of Environmental Law : An Empirical Study of the 33 / 50 Program , 2004 .

[46]  Ekundayo Shittu,et al.  Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control : Comment , 2004 .

[47]  Till Requate,et al.  Timing and Commitment of Environmental Policy, Adoption of New Technology, and Repercussions on R&D , 2005 .

[48]  M. Khanna,et al.  Does Pollution Prevention Reduce Toxic Releases?: A Dynamic Panel Data Model , 2012 .

[49]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Policy and Technological Change , 2002 .

[50]  Abdoul G. Sam Impact of government-sponsored pollution prevention practices on environmental compliance and enforcement: evidence from a sample of US manufacturing facilities , 2010 .

[51]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[52]  Wayne B. Gray,et al.  The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence , 2011, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[53]  David A. Malueg Emission credit trading and the incentive to adopt new pollution abatement technology , 1989 .

[54]  Karen Pence The Role of Wealth Transformations: An Application to Estimating the Effect of Tax Incentives on Saving , 2006 .

[55]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[56]  Ioannis Ioannou,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance , 2012, Manag. Sci..