A dual-process model of the influence of human values on consumer choice

A dual-process model for how consumer values influence product choice is proposed. Recent theoretical developments regarding what products mean to consumers, how they are judged, and what motives they satisfy suggest two processes. First, when consumers evaluate a product’s utilitarian meaning, use a piecemeal judgment, and the product satisfies an instrumental motivation, the human values they endorse determine which tangible attributes are important; they compare the product’s actual tangible attributes to their preferred tangible attributes, and choose the product that comes closest. In contrast, when consumers evaluate a product’s symbolic meaning, use an affective judgment, and the product satisfies an expressive motivation, their values may influence product choice directly. In particular, individuals compare the cultural values symbolized by the product to the human values they endorse, choosing the product with the most congruency. Current and future directions of the dual-process model are discussed.

[1]  J. Gusfield,et al.  Secular Symbolism: Studies of Ritual, Ceremony, and the Symbolic Order in Modern Life , 1984 .

[2]  M. R. Solomon.  The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective , 1983 .

[3]  A. Worsley,et al.  The factors associated with the belief that vegetarian diets provide health benefits. , 2003, Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  Michael W. Allen,et al.  Food Symbolism and Consumer Choice in Brazil , 2006 .

[5]  S. Levy.  Symbols for Sale , 1999 .

[6]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. , 1985 .

[7]  Joop de Boer,et al.  Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history , 2005, Appetite.

[8]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes toward objects as predictors of sin-gle and multiple behavioral criteria , 1974 .

[9]  Marc S. Wilson.  Values and Political Ideology: Rokeach's Two-Value Model in a Proportional Representation Environment , 2004 .

[10]  R. Zajonc.  On the primacy of affect. , 1984 .

[11]  R. Lazarus.  Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. , 1982 .

[12]  S. Ng,et al.  The direct and indirect influences of human values on product ownership , 1999 .

[13]  L. Kahle.  Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America , 1983 .

[14]  R. Abelson.  Beliefs Are Like Possessions , 1986 .

[15]  James K. Beggan.  Using what you own to get what you need: The role of possessions in satisfying control motivation. , 1991 .

[16]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Psychological Correspondence of Possessions, Attitudes, and Values , 1987 .

[17]  Alan S. Miller.  Cognitive Styles: an integrated model , 1987 .

[18]  Lorand B. Szalay,et al.  Subjective meaning and culture : an assessment through word associations , 1978 .

[19]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  Beliefs as possessions: A functional perspective. , 1989 .

[20]  W. A. Spivey,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of persuasive communications: Matching message with functional profile , 1983 .

[21]  D. Katz.  THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[22]  Koert van Ittersum,et al.  Improving Attribute-Importance Measurement: A Reference-Point Approach , 2004 .

[23]  Kenneth D. Bahn,et al.  Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism , 1982 .

[24]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[25]  Arjun Chaudhuri,et al.  Affect, Reason, and Persuasion: Advertising Strategies That Predict Affective and Analytic-Cognitive Responses. , 1995 .

[26]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Perceptions of Intercollegiate Athletic Goals and Processes: The Influence of Personal Values , 2002 .

[27]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Symbolic self-completion , 1982 .

[28]  Barbara L. Gross,et al.  Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values , 1991 .

[29]  S. Ng,et al.  Human values, utilitarian benefits and identification: the case of meat , 2003 .

[30]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[31]  Marsha L. Richins.  Valuing Things: The Public and Private Meanings of Possessions , 1994 .

[32]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Food and values: an examination of values underlying attitudes toward genetically modified- and organically grown food products , 2005, Appetite.

[33]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Opinions and Personality. , 1956 .

[34]  Cue Configurality in Esthetic Responses , 1981 .

[35]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Attributes of Attributes and Layers of Meaning , 1980 .

[36]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  The role of attitude objects in attitude functions , 1990 .