Measuring environmentally sensitive productivity growth: : An application to the urban water sector

The energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in the provision of urban water and sewerage services have become an increasingly important issue in recent times. However, the impact of negative externalities such as greenhouse gas emissions on the productivity of urban water provision has received less attention in the literature. This paper applies the global Malmquist–Luenberger (GML) productivity index, which accounts for undesirable outputs in order to evaluate the productivity trends in the Australian urban water sector. Results indicate that the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions significantly influences the productivity measurement. Findings also indicate that the conventional index, which disregards undesirable outputs, over-states the productivity growth. Despite a declining trend in greenhouse emissions over the period, the overall productivity trend of the urban water sector experienced a downward trend while accounting for bad output. This productivity decline occurs in a period of prolonged drought, water security concerns and increased reliance on desalinization and water recycling.

[1]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Productivity growth in OECD countries: A comparison with Malmquist indices , 2005 .

[2]  Brian Dollery,et al.  The relative economic efficiency of urban water utilities in regional New South Wales and Victoria , 2010 .

[3]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Designing performance incentives , an international benchmark study in the water sector , 2010 .

[4]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  Urban water sector performance in Africa: A step-wise bias-corrected efficiency and effectiveness analysis , 2012 .

[5]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and public transportation: A comment , 2010 .

[6]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[7]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis , 2010 .

[8]  Hans Bressers,et al.  Productivity growth and environmental regulations - accounting for undesirable outputs: Analysis of China's thirty provincial regions using the Malmquist–Luenberger index , 2011 .

[9]  J. Pastor,et al.  A global Malmquist productivity index , 2005 .

[10]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[11]  David S. Saal,et al.  Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000 , 2007 .

[12]  Qi Li,et al.  A nonparametric test for equality of distributions with mixed categorical and continuous data , 2009 .

[13]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[14]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Nonparametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Comment , 2003 .

[15]  M. Abbott,et al.  The performance of the urban water and wastewater sectors in Australia , 2012 .

[16]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Technological change and timing reductions in greenhouse gas emissions , 2012 .

[17]  R. Färe,et al.  Accounting for Air Pollution Emissions in Measures of State Manufacturing Productivity Growth , 2001 .

[18]  Robin C. Sickles,et al.  The role of environmental factors in growth accounting , 2004 .

[19]  Bruce Cohen,et al.  Productivity and efficiency in the water industry , 2009 .

[20]  Dong-hyun Oh,et al.  A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index , 2010 .

[21]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach , 1992 .

[22]  N. Pawsey,et al.  The Mystique of Water Pricing and Accounting , 2013 .

[23]  Jay R. Lund,et al.  Residential water conservation in Australia and California. , 2013 .

[24]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  Institutional Reforms to Enhance Urban Water Infrastructure with Climate Change Uncertainty , 2014 .

[25]  Dong-hyun Oh A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index , 2010 .

[26]  Andrew C. Worthington,et al.  Productivity, efficiency and technological progress in Australia's urban water , 2011 .

[27]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[28]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[29]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: Recent Developments and Perspectives , 2013 .

[30]  Rolf Färe,et al.  New directions : efficiency and productivity , 2004 .

[31]  T. Coelli,et al.  Performance measurement in the Australian water supply industry: A preliminary analysis , 2005 .

[32]  R. Shepherd Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[33]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Stephen Cook,et al.  Energy use in the provision and consumption of urban water in Australia: an update , 2012 .

[35]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[36]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Optimal path for controlling CO2 emissions in China: A perspective of efficiency analysis , 2014 .