The Ways of Criticism

This paper attempts to systematically characterize critical reactions in argumentative discourse, such as objections, critical questions, rebuttals, refutations, counterarguments, and fallacy charges, in order to contribute to the dialogical approach to argumentation. We shall make use of four parameters to characterize distinct types of critical reaction. First, a critical reaction has a focus, for example on the standpoint, or on another part of an argument. Second, critical reactions appeal to some kind of norm, argumentative or other. Third, they each have a particular illocutionary force, which may include that of giving strategic advice to the other. Fourth, a critical reaction occurs at a particular level of dialogue (the ground level or some meta-level). The concepts here developed shall be applied to discussions of critical reactions by Aristotle and by some contemporary authors.

[1]  E. Krabbe,et al.  The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance , 2012, Argumentation.

[2]  S. Jackson,et al.  Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse , 1993 .

[3]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation , 2010 .

[4]  Galileo Galilei,et al.  Galileo on the World Systems: A New Abridged Translation and Guide , 1997 .

[5]  F. H. Eemeren.  Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. , 2002 .

[6]  F. V. Eemeren.  A systematic theory of argumentation , 2004 .

[7]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[8]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge , 1977 .

[9]  Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.  Profiles of Dialogue as a Dialectical Tool , 2002 .

[10]  Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.  CMNA X: the 10th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument , 2010, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[11]  Alan Sica.  Galileo and the Art of Reasoning: Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method , 1981, Telos.

[12]  M. Finocchiaro.  Galileo and the Art of Reasoning , 1980 .

[13]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Speech acts in argumentative discussions , 1984 .

[14]  P. Houtlosser,et al.  Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse , 2002 .

[15]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  Advances in Pragma Dialectics , 2002 .

[16]  Peter Houtlosser,et al.  Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis , 2002 .

[17]  David Hitchcock.  Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model , 2006, Arguing on the Toulmin Model.

[18]  Erik C. W. Krabbe.  Nothing but Objections , 2007 .

[19]  Van Eemeren.  Crucial concepts in argumentation theory , 2001 .

[20]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Speech acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion (vertaling in het Russisch) , 1984 .

[21]  D. Walton.  Objections, Rebuttals and Refutations , 2009 .

[22]  Aristotle,et al.  Topics : Books I and VIII, with excerpts from related texts , 1997 .

[23]  Chris Reed,et al.  Formal Dialectic Specification , 2004, ArgMAS.

[24]  A. F. S. Henkemans,et al.  Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion , 2003 .

[25]  Snoeck Henkemans,et al.  Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion , 1992 .

[26]  Ralph H. Johnson.  Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument , 2000 .

[27]  M. Finocchiaro.  Arguments, Meta-arguments, and Metadialogues: A Reconstruction of Krabbe, Govier, and Woods , 2007 .

[28]  M. Finocchiaro.  Six types of fallaciousness: Toward a realistic theory of logical criticism , 1987 .

[29]  Aristotle,et al.  On Sophistical Refutations. On Coming-to-be and Passing Away. On the Cosmos , 1955 .

[30]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[31]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective , 1992 .

[32]  The speech acts of arguing and convincing in externalized discussions. , 1982 .

[33]  J. Blair.  The Philosophy of Argument , 2009 .

[34]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation , 2005, J. Log. Comput..

[35]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Anyone who has a view : theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation , 2003 .

[36]  E. Krabbe.  Strategies in Dialectic and Rhetoric , 2004 .

[37]  J. Pollock.  Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person , 1995 .

[38]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Logical Self-Defense , 1977 .

[39]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, First International Workshop, ArgMAS 2004, New York, NY, USA, July 19, 2004, Revised Selected and Invited Papers , 2005, ArgMAS.

[40]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity , 2005 .

[41]  James B. Freeman,et al.  Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments , 1991 .