Quantitative Correlation Between IKDC Score, Static Laxity, and Pivot-Shift Test: A Kinematic Analysis of Knee Stability in Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Several methods have been used to describe the pivot-shift phenomenon in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees; in this study we analyzed this test intraoperatively with a navigation system, to quantify its components and to highlight its clinical relevance, correlating it with the laxity test (Lachman and I/E rotation at 30°) and a clinical score (ie, the International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]). Eighteen consecutive patients who had undergone anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in this study. A commercial navigation system (BLU-IGS, Orthokey, Lewes, DE) was used for kinematic acquisitions. For the pivot-shift test anteroposterior translation and internal/external (IE) rotation with respect to flexion/extension (FE) angle were analyzed by the evaluation of the areas included by the curves and the corresponding peaks. Each parameter was correlated with static laxities and preoperative IKDC score. Maximum peaks during pivot-shift test were reached between 20° and 30° of flexion. Both the AP and IE areas demonstrated a statistically significant reduction. There was no correlation between the Lachman test and the AP Peak or between IE rotation at 30° and the IE peak during the pivot-shift test. Preoperatively, patients with an IKDC grade "D" had significantly larger AP and IE areas compared with patients with IKDC grade "C"; after anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction, there was no more difference in areas. A strictly relationship between AP and IE areas and the preoperative IKDC score was demonstrated. The presented quantification results extremely helpful in characterizing patient-specific laxity and ACL reconstruction performance, thus quantifying and improving the clinical relevance of pivot-shift test.

[1]  H. Matsumoto Mechanism of the pivot shift. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  L. Snyder-Mackler,et al.  The Relationship Between Passive Joint Laxity and Functional Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Daniel Kendoff,et al.  In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction , 2008, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  R. Jakob,et al.  Observations on rotatory instability of the lateral compartment of the knee. Experimental studies on the functional anatomy and the pathomechanism of the true and the reversed pivot shift sign. , 1981, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  M. Marcacci,et al.  New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[6]  J. A. Ostrowski Accuracy of 3 diagnostic tests for anterior cruciate ligament tears. , 2006, Journal of athletic training.

[7]  S Martelli,et al.  KIN-Nav navigation system for kinematic assessment in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Features, use, and perspectives , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  Kouki Nagamune,et al.  In Vivo Measurement of the Pivot-Shift Test in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Deficient Knee Using an Electromagnetic Device , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  A. De Carli,et al.  Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of instrumented knee‐drawer tests , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  W. Müller,et al.  Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  William I. Sterett,et al.  Relationships between Objective Assessment of Ligament Stability and Subjective Assessment of Symptoms and Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  Stefano Zaffagnini,et al.  Description and validation of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of knee laxity. , 2007, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[14]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  James R. Robinson,et al.  Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles on Knee Kinematics , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  M. Prins The Lachman test is the most sensitive and the pivot shift the most specific test for the diagnosis of ACL rupture. , 2006, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[17]  M Tew,et al.  Is the KT1000 knee ligament arthrometer reliable? , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  A A Amis,et al.  Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  James R. Robinson,et al.  Using Navigation to Measure Rotation Kinematics during ACL Reconstruction , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  Galway Hr,et al.  The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. , 1980 .

[21]  Stefano Zaffagnini,et al.  Validation of a new protocol for navigated intraoperative assessment of knee kinematics , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[22]  Andrew A. Amis,et al.  The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective , 1998 .

[23]  Konsei Shino,et al.  Force sharing between two grafts in the anatomical two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[24]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Anatomic, radiographic, biomechanical, and kinematic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament and its two functional bundles. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  R P Jakob,et al.  Grading the pivot shift. Objective tests with implications for treatment. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.