Processes controlling human movement: neuromotor constraints on American Sign Language.

The study of sign languages provides a promising vehicle for investigating language production because the movements of the articulators in sign are directly observable. Movement of the hands and arms is an essential element not only in the lexical structure of American Sign Language (ASL), but most strikingly, in the grammatical structure of ASL: It is in patterned changes of the movement of signs that many grammatical attributes are represented. The "phonological" (formational) structure of movement in ASL surely reflects in part constraints on the channel through which it is conveyed. We evaluate the relation between one neuromotor constraint on movement-regulation of final position rather than of movement amplitude-and the phonological structure of movement in ASL. We combine three-dimensional measurements of ASL movements with linguistic analyses of the distinctiveness and predictability of the final position (location) versus the amplitude (length). We show that final position, not movement amplitude, is distinctive in the language and that a phonological rule in ASL predicts variation in movement amplitude-a development which may reflect a neuromuscular constraint on the articulatory mechanism through which the language is conveyed.

[1]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Processes controlling arm movements in monkeys. , 1978, Science.

[2]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J A Kelso,et al.  Preselection in short-term motor memory. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[4]  K. Holt,et al.  The role of proprioception in the perception and control of human movement: Toward a theoretical reassessment , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Carol Padden,et al.  Some Arguments for Syntactic Patterning in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[6]  J. Kelso,et al.  Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Patricia Siple,et al.  Visual Constraints for Sign Language Communication , 2013 .

[8]  H Poizner,et al.  Visual and "phonetic" coding of movement: evidence from American sign language. , 1981, Science.

[9]  D Goodman,et al.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination. , 1979, Science.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  E. Klima The signs of language , 1979 .

[12]  M. Mandel Natural Constraints in Sign Language Phonology: Data from Anatomy , 2013 .

[13]  U Bellugi,et al.  Representation of inflected signs from American Sign Language in short-term memory , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[14]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Processes controlling visually evoked movements , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Hartmut Robbin Harlan Joe Jim Teuber,et al.  A Computerized Lexicon of American Sign Language: The DASL 1965 in FORTRAN , 2013 .

[16]  J. Kelso Motor control mechanisms underlying human movement reproduction. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[18]  Howard Poizner,et al.  A computer program to synthesize American Sign Language , 1982 .

[19]  R. F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for morphologically related words. , 1979 .