A Maturity-based Improvement Method for Eco-efficiency in Manufacturing Systems

Abstract Eco-efficiency has been portrayed by various global organizations in recent years, as an effective way of reducing industry's carbon footprint and safe-guard natural resources. It is a concept that has been reduced for simplicity into “doing more with less”. However, very few studies address eco-efficiency through a holistic approach that can guide practitioners in achieving better control over their manufacturing practices. Using design research methodology and based on previous empirical work, the authors present a method that intends to help practitioners in factories achieve environmental performance improvements by identifying system strengths and weaknesses. The method can be seen as consisting of two main modules: a maturity self-assessment process and a practitioners’ workshop. Two case studies are presented here to show how the method can be applied and help practitioners simplify and make eco-efficiency a manageable target.

[1]  Peter Ball,et al.  Barriers to industrial energy efficiency , 2014 .

[2]  Peter Ball,et al.  Integrating Energy Efficiency into Industrial Strategy – A Case Study from the European Aerospace Sector , 2015 .

[3]  Steve Evans,et al.  Maturity grid development for energy and resource efficiency management in factories and early findings from its application , 2015 .

[4]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  A novel approach for barriers to industrial energy efficiency , 2013 .

[5]  Mike Gregory,et al.  International manufacturing networks—to develop global competitive capabilities , 1998 .

[6]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Visualizing Roadmaps: A Design-Driven Approach , 2015 .

[7]  Bahman Shabani,et al.  Capability Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing of Sports Apparel and Footwear , 2012 .

[8]  N. Eyre,et al.  Public policy analysis of energy efficiency and load management in changing electricity businesses , 2003 .

[9]  Sandra Rothenberg,et al.  Suppliers and Environmental Innovation: The Automotive Paint Process , 2000 .

[10]  Stephen Evans,et al.  A comparison of four sustainable manufacturing strategies , 2008 .

[11]  Enrique Claver,et al.  Environmental management and firm performance: a case study. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A design research methodology , 1995 .

[13]  Kasra Ferdows,et al.  Building Factory Fitness , 2011 .

[14]  R. Baumgartner,et al.  Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels , 2010 .

[15]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[16]  Horst-Christian Langowski,et al.  Life cycle assessment study on resilient floor coverings , 1997 .

[17]  D. O'Rourke.  The science of sustainable supply chains , 2014, Science.

[18]  N. Phillips,et al.  COERCED PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION IN CASES OF LOW CULTURAL FIT: CULTURAL CHANGE AND PRACTICE ADAPTATION DURING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SIX SIGMA AT 3M , 2013 .