Factors influencing the distribution and feeding of the larvae of Chironomus riparius

Chironomids are the most widely distributed group of insect larvae in freshwater environments. They are frequently the dominant primary consumers and show competitive interactions due to their requirements for foraging space in suitable substrates. In order to investigate the factors involved in substrate selection a simple choice chamber has been constructed that enables larvae of Chironomus riparius Meigen (Diptera, Chironomidae) to select wells, in which they can establish tubes, according to a number of chemical and physical parameters. The statistical probabilities of them aggregating randomly in this way were calculated for a variety of occupancies. The larvae developed distinct patterns of non‐random aggregation in the wells. Subsequent experiments showed that the presence of food at sites of burrowing affected settling but physical irregularities were necessary in order to facilitate burrowing and establish random patterns. Once the animals had selected their habitat the rate of feeding on the sediment was relatively constant with a gut‐clearance time of about 12 h although starving the animals before or after feeding affected the rate of passage of sediment through the anterior of the gut.

[1]  A. Benke.  PRODUCTION DYNAMICS OF RIVERINE CHIRONOMIDS: EXTREMELY HIGH BIOMASS TURNOVER RATES OF PRIMARY CONSUMERS , 1998 .

[2]  G. Ankley,et al.  Chironomus tentans life‐cycle test: Design and evaluation for use in assessing toxicity of contaminated sediments , 1997 .

[3]  C. W. West,et al.  Equilibrium partitioning as the basis for an integrated laboratory and field assessment of the impacts of DDT, DDE and DDD in sediments , 1997 .

[4]  J. Pellinen,et al.  Preliminary study to compare body residues and sublethal energetic responses in benthic invertebrates exposed to sediment‐bound 2,4,5‐trichlorophenol , 1996 .

[5]  G. Ankley,et al.  Gut content weight and clearance rate for three species of freshwater invertebrates , 1996 .

[6]  The Chironomidae.  The Chironomidae , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[7]  R. Lowe,et al.  Periphyton Patch Preference in Grazing Chironomid Larvae , 1994, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[8]  W. Bund,et al.  Complex relations between freshwater macro- and meiobenthos: interactions between Chironomus riparius and Chydorus piger , 1993 .

[9]  M. Power,et al.  Variation in the Vulnerability of Prey to Different Predators: Community-Level Consequences , 1992 .

[10]  C. E. Cowan,et al.  Technical basis for establishing sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic chemicals using equilibrium partitioning , 1991 .

[11]  K. Buhl,et al.  Acute toxicity of selected herbicides and surfactants to larvae of the midgeChironomus riparius , 1989 .

[12]  K. A. Williams,et al.  Studies on the acute toxicity of pollutants to freshwater macroinvertebrates 4. Lindane (y-Hexachlorocyclohexane) , 1986, Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

[13]  L. Pinder.  Biology of Freshwater Chironomidae , 1986 .

[14]  J. Rasmussen.  Comparison of gut contents and assimilation efficiency of fourth instar larvae of two coexisting chironomids, Chironomus riparius meigen and Glyptotendipes paripes (Edwards) , 1984 .

[15]  J. Culp,et al.  Relative Importance of Substrate Particle Size and Detritus to Stream Benthic Macroinvertebrate Microdistribution , 1983 .

[16]  O. Johannsson.  Energy Dynamics of the Eutrophic Chironomid Chironomus plumosus f. semireductus from the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario , 1980 .

[17]  A. Gower,et al.  Water quality and the occurrence of Chironomus riparius Meigen (Diptera: Chironomidae) in a stream receiving sewage effluent , 1978 .

[18]  B. R. Davies.  The Planktonic Activity of Larval Chironomidae in Loch Leven, Kinross , 1974 .

[19]  D. R. Oliver,et al.  Life History of the Chironomidae , 1971 .

[20]  P. Meadows,et al.  Case Construction, Movement, Spatial Distribution and Substrate Selection in the Larva of Chironomus Riparius Meigen , 1969 .