JOURNAL OF RADIOGRAPHY AND RADIATION SCIENCES IMPACT OF ULTRASOUND AND SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES ON MATERNAL FOETAL ATTACHMENT IN TARABA STATE, NIGERIA

Background: Maternal foetal attachment is manifested in behaviors that demonstrate care and commitment to the foetus. Ultrasound decreases maternal anxiety and confers psychological benefit following a reassuring sonogram. Maternal-foetal attachment is affected by many socio-demographic factors which include maternal age, occupation, educational level, race, marriage duration, ethnicity, Religion, income status, pregnancy planning, and identification of the foetal gender Aim: This study was aimed at assessing the effect of ultrasound and sociodemographic factors on maternal foetal attachment during pregnancy. Method: A prospective study was conducted from November, 2019 to March, 2020. A convenient sampling method was employed and included 404 pregnant nd rd women aged 18-45 years old in their 2 and 3 trimester. The data were collected using a maternal foetal attachment scale questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out at p value < 0.05. Result: The score of maternal foetal attachment scale was greater with post ultrasound than the pre ultrasound. There was statistically significant difference between the pre and post ultrasound maternal foetal attachment scale ( p=0.000).. A statistically significant difference was observed in the maternal foetal attachment across the different ethnic groups (p=0.000), planned and unplanned pregnancy (p=0.000). Conclusion: This study revealed that ultrasound scan has influence on maternal foetal attachment, planned pregnancy. Hausa, Bandawa and Jenjo were found to be more attached to their foetuses. ABSTRACT

[1]  H. El-Sayed,et al.  Factors affecting the maternal-fetal attachment during pregnancy , 2021, Mansoura Nursing Journal.

[2]  Gintautas Domža,et al.  Factors affecting the maternal-foetal relationship. , 2019, Acta medica Lituanica.

[3]  Maw-Sheng Lee,et al.  Maternal-foetal attachment during early pregnancy in Taiwanese women pregnant by in vitro fertilization. , 2013, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  E. Tromp,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound and maternal bonding, a third trimester study and a review , 2013, Prenatal diagnosis.

[5]  S. Moussa,et al.  Correlates of antenatal bonding ( an Egyptian Study) , 2012 .

[6]  A. Akyüz,et al.  Comparison of maternal-and paternal-fetal attachment in Turkish couples. , 2010, Midwifery.

[7]  A. Siddiqui,et al.  A study of prenatal attachment with Swedish and Polish expectant mothers , 2008 .

[8]  C. Boukydis,et al.  Women's Responses to Ultrasound Examinations During Routine Screens in an Obstetric Clinic , 2006, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  B Sedgmen,et al.  The impact of two‐dimensional versus three‐dimensional ultrasound exposure on maternal–fetal attachment and maternal health behavior in pregnancy , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  U. Nicolini,et al.  Maternal/paternal antenatal attachment and fourth-dimensional ultrasound technique: a preliminary report. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[11]  M. S. Cranley Development of a Tool for the Measurement of Maternal Attachment During Pregnancy , 1981, Nursing research.