Articulating and responding to uncertainties in clinical research.

This paper introduces taxonomy of clinical uncertaintes and argues that the choice of scientific method should match the underlying level of uncertainty. Clinical trial is one of these methods aiming to resolve clinical uncertainties. Whenever possible these uncertainties should be quantified. The paper further shows that the still ongoing debate about the usage of "equipoise" vs. "uncertainty principle" vs. "indifference" as an entry criterion to clinical trials actually refers to the question "whose uncertainty counts". This question is intimately linked to the control of research agenda, which is not quantifiable and hence is not solvable to equal acceptability to all interested parties. The author finally shows that there is a predictable relation between [acknowledgement of] uncertainty (the moral principle) on which trials are based and the ultimate outcomes of clinical trials. That is, [acknowledgement of] uncertainty determines a pattern of success in medicine and drives clinical discoveries.

[1]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  BMC Medical Research Methodology BioMed Central Debate , 2003 .

[2]  I. Hozo,et al.  Evaluation of new treatments in radiation oncology: are they better than standard treatments? , 2005, JAMA.

[3]  Casting and drawing lots: a time honoured way of dealing with uncertainty and ensuring fairness , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  B. Djulbegovic.  Acknowledgment of uncertainty: A fundamental means to ensure scientific and ethical validity in clinical research , 2001, Current oncology reports.

[5]  N. Daniels,et al.  Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. , 1997, Philosophy & public affairs.

[6]  R. Lilford,et al.  At what level of collective equipoise does a clinical trial become ethical? , 1991, Journal of medical ethics.

[7]  K. Arrow.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[8]  B. Freedman.  Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  J. Rawls.  A Theory of Justice , 1999 .

[10]  M. Clarke,et al.  The Importance of the Preservation of the Ethical Principle of Equipoise in the Design of Clinical Trials: Relative Impact of the Methodological Quality Domains on the Treatment Effect in Randomized Controlled Trials , 2003, Accountability in research.

[11]  R. Matthews,et al.  What are the implications of optimism bias in clinical research? , 2006, The Lancet.

[12]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. Equipose and uncertainty principle are not mutually exclusive. , 2001, BMJ.

[13]  R J Lilford,et al.  Equipoise and the ethics of randomization. , 1995, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[14]  I. Hozo,et al.  At what degree of belief in a research hypothesis is a trial in humans justified? , 2002, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[15]  R. Cottrell,et al.  Evaluating "payback" on biomedical research - Biomedical funding decisions should be audited - Reply , 2000 .

[16]  Hill Ab,et al.  The clinical trial. , 1952 .

[17]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[18]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[19]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Satisfaction of the uncertainty principle in cancer clinical trials: retrospective cohort analysis , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  R. Ashcroft.  Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice. , 1999, Bioethics.

[22]  H. Welch,et al.  Presumed benefit: lessons from the American experience with marrow transplantation for breast cancer , 2002, British medical journal.

[23]  M. Bracken,et al.  Clinical trials and the acceptance of uncertainty. , 1987, British medical journal.

[24]  Iain Chalmers,et al.  Well informed uncertainties about the effects of treatments , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  C. Foster.  The Ethics of Medical Research on Humans , 2001 .

[26]  Hill Ab,et al.  Medical ethics and controlled trials. , 1963 .

[27]  D. Rosenstein,et al.  The therapeutic orientation to clinical trials. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  R. Veatch.  INDIFFERENCE OF SUBJECTS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO EQUIPOISE IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS , 2002, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[29]  I. Good.  On the Principle of Total Evidence , 1967 .

[30]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[31]  R. Collins,et al.  Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, I: clinical trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[32]  R Peto,et al.  Trials: the next 50 years , 1998, BMJ.

[33]  C. Warlow.  Advanced issues in the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials: the bigger the better? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.