Multi-storey timber construction and bioeconomy – barriers and opportunities

Multi-storey timber construction has been developed and promoted in Finland since the 1990s. Despite these efforts, the share of timber frames in multi-storey construction has remained very low. Construction business is also very resource intensive and accounts for a large share of greenhouse gas emissions. Increasing the use of renewable materials, mainly wood, in buildings, could make construction more sustainable and a part of bioeconomy. This study aimed at identifying barriers to the adoption of multi-storey timber construction, ways in which wood could compete with established solutions and possibilities for partly integrating construction into bioeconomy. Based on 18 interviews of representatives from the entire value chain, this study presents insights into introducing new solutions into a conservative field. Our results indicate that multi-storey timber construction could offer competitive solutions for more sustainable construction, even though barriers to its adoption still exist.

[1]  M. Halme,et al.  Business from sustainability : drivers for energy efficient housing , 2005 .

[2]  Robert A. Kozak,et al.  Wood use in nonresidential construction : A case for communication with architects , 2009 .

[3]  Alan Watson,et al.  Front page , 2007, Cognitive Systems Research.

[4]  Juha Honkatukia,et al.  Low carbon Finland 2050: VTT clean energy technology strategies for society , 2012 .

[5]  Wasim Saman,et al.  The impact of niche green developments in transforming the building sector: The case study of Lochiel Park , 2013 .

[6]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  Forty Years of Diffusion of Innovations: Utility and Value in Public Health , 2004, Journal of health communication.

[7]  Lei Wang,et al.  Use of wood in green building: a study of expert perspectives from the UK , 2014 .

[8]  Roger Sathre,et al.  A Synthesis of Research on Wood Products and Greenhouse Gas Impacts , 2008 .

[9]  Jonathan Groucutt,et al.  Marketing: Essential Principles, New Realities , 2004 .

[10]  Anders Roos,et al.  The Influence of Architects and Structural Engineers on Timber in Construction - Perceptions and Roles , 2010 .

[11]  Robert A. Kozak,et al.  Wood use in nonresidential buildings: Opportunities and barriers , 2004 .

[12]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Blue ocean strategy : how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant , 2005 .

[13]  Krushna Mahapatra,et al.  Perceptions, attitudes and interest of Swedish architects towards the use of wood frames in multi-storey buildings , 2011 .

[14]  Ursula Backhaus,et al.  SEVENTH CHAPTER OF THE THEORY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT , 2002 .

[15]  Matthew Min,et al.  Definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises , 2014 .

[16]  E. Rogers.  New Product Adoption and Diffusion , 1976 .

[17]  Ardi Daniels.  Life and living in low energy houses - Study of technical solutions in low energy houses, satisfaction, lifestyle and changes for the residents , 2007 .

[18]  Erika Levander.  Addressing client uncertainty : a Swedish property owners' perspective on industrialised timber framed housing and property , 2010 .