Electrical Mobility Spectrometer Using a Diethylene Glycol Condensation Particle Counter for Measurement of Aerosol Size Distributions Down to 1 nm

We report a new scanning mobility particle spectrometer (SMPS) for measuring number size distributions of particles down to ∼1 nm mobility diameter. This SMPS includes an aerosol charger, a TSI 3085 nano differential mobility analyzer (nanoDMA), an ultrafine condensation particle counter (UCPC) using diethylene glycol (DEG) as the working fluid, and a conventional butanol CPC (the “booster”) to detect the small droplets leaving the DEG UCPC. The response of the DEG UCPC to negatively charged sodium chloride particles with mobility diameters ranging from 1–6 nm was measured. The sensitivity of the DEG UCPC to particle composition was also studied by comparing its response to positively charged 1.47 and 1.70 nm tetra-alkyl ammonium ions, sodium chloride, and silver particles. A high resolution differential mobility analyzer was used to generate the test particles. These results show that the response of this UCPC to sub-2 nm particles is sensitive to particle composition. The applicability of the new SMPS for atmospheric measurement was demonstrated during the Nucleation and Cloud Condensation Nuclei (NCCN) field campaign (Atlanta, Georgia, summer 2009). We operated the instrument at saturator and condenser temperatures that allowed the efficient detection of sodium chloride particles but not of air ions having the same mobility. We found that particles as small as 1 nm were detected during nucleation events but not at other times. Factors affecting size distribution measurements, including aerosol charging in the 1–10 nm size range, are discussed. For the charger used in this study, bipolar charging was found to be more effective for sub-2 nm particles than unipolar charging. No ion induced nucleation inside the charger was observed during the NCCN campaign.

[1]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Preface to topical collection on new particle formation in Atlanta , 2005 .

[2]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity of aerosol properties to new particle formation mechanism and to primary emissions in a continental‐scale chemical transport model , 2009 .

[3]  J. Mora,et al.  Electrical Classification and Condensation Detection of Sub‐3‐nm Aerosols , 2011 .

[4]  P. Ziemann,et al.  Reaction of oleic acid particles with NO3 radicals: Products, mechanism, and implications for radical-initiated organic aerosol oxidation. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[5]  Mikael Ehn,et al.  Observations of aminium salts in atmospheric nanoparticles and possible climatic implications , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  E. Knutson EXTENDED ELECTRIC MOBILITY METHOD FOR MEASURING AEROSOL PARTICLE SIZE AND CONCENTRATION , 1976 .

[7]  H. G. Scheibel,et al.  Generation of monodisperse Ag- and NaCl-aerosols with particle diameters between 2 and 300 nm , 1983 .

[8]  G. Mann,et al.  Contribution of particle formation to global cloud condensation nuclei concentrations , 2008 .

[9]  Richard C. Flagan,et al.  Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer , 1989 .

[10]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[11]  Da-Ren Chen,et al.  A High Efficiency, High Throughput Unipolar Aerosol Charger for Nanoparticles , 1999 .

[12]  Hanna Vehkamäki,et al.  Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations , 2004 .

[13]  M. Gamero-Castaño,et al.  Ion-induced nucleation: Measurement of the effect of embryo’s size and charge state on the critical supersaturation , 2002 .

[14]  S. Rosser,et al.  Vienna-Type DMA of High Resolution and High Flow Rate , 2005 .

[15]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  A submicron aerosol standard and the primary, absolute calibration of the condensation nuclei counter , 1974 .

[16]  Donald E. Hagen,et al.  Linear inversion method to obtain aerosol size distributions from measurements with a differential mobility analyzer , 1983 .

[17]  J. Smith,et al.  Contribution of ion‐induced nucleation to new particle formation: Methodology and its application to atmospheric observations in Boulder, Colorado , 2006 .

[18]  C. Percival,et al.  Structural analysis of oligomeric molecules formed from the reaction products of oleic acid ozonolysis. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Heinz Fissan,et al.  Design and evaluation of a nanometer aerosol differential mobility analyzer (Nano-DMA) , 1998 .

[20]  A. Wiedensohler,et al.  An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range , 1988 .

[21]  J. Smith,et al.  Estimating nanoparticle growth rates from size-dependent charged fractions: Analysis of new particle formation events in Mexico City , 2008 .

[22]  M. Stolzenburg,et al.  Effect of Working Fluid on Sub-2 nm Particle Detection with a Laminar Flow Ultrafine Condensation Particle Counter , 2009 .

[23]  T. Petäjä,et al.  The Role of Sulfuric Acid in Atmospheric Nucleation , 2010, Science.

[24]  L. Magnusson,et al.  Correlations for Vapor Nucleating Critical Embryo Parameters , 2003 .

[25]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Laboratory Verification of PH-CPC's Ability to Monitor Atmospheric Sub-3 nm Clusters , 2009 .

[26]  Da-Ren Chen,et al.  Measurement of Atlanta Aerosol Size Distributions: Observations of Ultrafine Particle Events , 2001 .

[27]  J. Smith,et al.  Atmospheric Measurements of Sub-20 nm Diameter Particle Chemical Composition by Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry , 2004 .

[28]  C. Wilson On the comparative efficiency as condensation nuclei of positively and negatively charged ions , 1900, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[29]  J. Smith,et al.  Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation , 2006 .

[30]  P. Biswas,et al.  Synthesis of nanoparticles in a flame aerosol reactor with independent and strict control of their size, crystal phase and morphology , 2007 .

[31]  N. Fuchs,et al.  On the stationary charge distribution on aerosol particles in a bipolar ionic atmosphere , 1963 .

[32]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  First Measurements of Neutral Atmospheric Cluster and 1–2 nm Particle Number Size Distributions During Nucleation Events , 2011 .

[33]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  The History of Condensation Nucleus Counters , 2000 .

[34]  J. Smith,et al.  Atmospheric New Particle Formation: Physical and Chemical Measurements , 2011 .

[35]  M. Stolzenburg,et al.  Equations Governing Single and Tandem DMA Configurations and a New Lognormal Approximation to the Transfer Function , 2008 .

[36]  C. Kuang,et al.  Determination of cloud condensation nuclei production from measured new particle formation events , 2009 .

[37]  M. Gamero-Castaño,et al.  A CONDENSATION NUCLEUS COUNTER (CNC) SENSITIVE TO SINGLY CHARGED SUB-NANOMETER PARTICLES , 2000 .

[38]  C. Kuang,et al.  Chemical ionization mass spectrometric measurements of atmospheric neutral clusters using the cluster-CIMS , 2010 .

[39]  N. Fletcher Size Effect in Heterogeneous Nucleation , 1958 .

[40]  B. Ku,et al.  Relation between Electrical Mobility, Mass, and Size for Nanodrops 1–6.5 nm in Diameter in Air , 2009 .

[41]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Nanometer Particle Detection by the Condensation Particle Counter UF-02proto , 2008 .

[42]  J. Smith,et al.  Hygroscopicity and volatility of 4-10 nm particles during summertime atmospheric nucleation events in urban Atlanta , 2005 .

[43]  K. Okuyama,et al.  Performance Evaluation of an Improved Particle Size Magnifier (PSM) for Single Nanoparticle Detection , 2003 .

[44]  Carlos Larriba,et al.  The Mobility–Volume Relationship below 3.0 nm Examined by Tandem Mobility–Mass Measurement , 2011 .

[45]  G. M. Frick,et al.  Ion—Aerosol Attachment Coefficients and the Steady-State Charge Distribution on Aerosols in a Bipolar Ion Environment , 1986 .

[46]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Heterogeneous Nucleation Experiments Bridging the Scale from Molecular Ion Clusters to Nanoparticles , 2008, Science.

[47]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[48]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Does nanoparticle activity depend upon size and crystal phase? , 2008, Nanotoxicology.

[49]  Mass accommodation of H2SO4 and CH3SO3H on water-sulfuric acid solutions from 6% to 97% RH. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[50]  R. Flagan,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Aerosol Science and Technology Transfer Functions and Penetrations of Five Differential Mobility Analyzers for Sub-2 Nm Particle Classification Transfer Functions and Penetrations of Five Differential Mobility Analyzers for Sub-2 Nm Particle Classification , 2022 .

[51]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  An Ultrafine Aerosol Condensation Nucleus Counter , 1991 .

[52]  J. Smith,et al.  Sampling nanoparticles for chemical analysis by low resolution electrical mobility classification. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  J. Mora,et al.  Differential mobility analysis of molecular ions and nanometer particles , 1998 .

[54]  A. Seth,et al.  Global climate change: An introduction and results from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) , 2007 .

[55]  P. Winkler,et al.  Condensation particle counting below 2 nm seed particle diameter and the transition from heterogeneous to homogeneous nucleation , 2008 .

[56]  P. Biswas,et al.  Nanostructured photoactive films synthesized by a flame aerosol reactor , 2007 .

[57]  J. Mora,et al.  Molecular monodisperse mobility and mass standards from electrosprays of tetra-alkyl ammonium halides , 2005 .

[58]  L. A. Sgro,et al.  A Simple Turbulent Mixing CNC for Charged Particle Detection Down to 1.2 nm , 2004 .