On the Difference or Equality of Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation: A Critical Research Perspective

More and better information is often seen as a prerequisite for better management practices. It is the task of information systems to collect or create such information. These simple premises are problematic, however. One of the reasons for this is that the very concept of information is not clear. This paper discusses the notion of information as well as the apparently opposing notions of misinformation and disinformation from a critical research perspective. Starting with a discussion of the question of truth, the paper argues that there is no agreement on what truth is and, therefore, what information is. The critical approach provides a different way of understanding these issues. Critical research aims to change the status quo and lead to emancipation. Drawing on two of the most prominent theoreticians of critical research, Jurgen Habermas and Michel Foucault, the paper explores what truth and information can mean for critical research. The contribution of the paper is to extend the debate on information and truth beyond its typical confines and show to the researcher that these issues are not value-neutral; every commitment to a research approach is a value choice that the researcher makes and needs to reflect on.

[1]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[2]  David L. Levy Critical Approaches to Strategic Management , 2001 .

[3]  Eileen M. Trauth Choosing qualitative methods in IS research: lessons learned , 2001 .

[4]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  The stakeholder dimension in information systems evaluation , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Critique and power : recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate , 1994 .

[6]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  The rationality framework for a critical study of information systems , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  Making sense of e-commerce as social action , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[8]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Management, Information and Power: A Narrative of the Involved Manager , 1999 .

[9]  Btjbsell L. Ackoft,et al.  MANAGEMENT MISINFORMATION SYSTEMS* , 2007 .

[10]  M. Alvesson,et al.  On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies , 1992 .

[11]  F. A. Wilson,et al.  The truth is out there: the search for emancipatory principles in information systems design , 1997, Inf. Technol. People.

[12]  Patrick Grim,et al.  Information and Meaning: Use-Based Models in Arrays of Neural Nets , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[13]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[14]  R. Mason Four ethical issues of the information age , 1986 .

[15]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Key information liability issues facing managers: software piracy, proprietary databases, and indi , 1990 .

[16]  John Mingers,et al.  Embodying information systems: the contribution of phenomenology , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[17]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  Managerial information, the basics , 2001 .

[18]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A theoretical review of management and information systems using a critical communications theory , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  R. Rorty Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays, 1972-1980. , 1982 .

[20]  H. Gadamer Wahrheit und Methode : Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik , 1965 .

[21]  J. Habermas Faktizität und Geltung : Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats , 1992 .

[22]  Drew Khlentzos Naturalistic realism and the antirealist challenge , 2004 .

[23]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, CONTROL AND POWER: THE CENTRALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION DEBATE REVISITED* , 1992 .

[24]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[25]  Gustavo Leyva,et al.  El universalismo y la nunca acabada inclusión del otro. RESEÑA de : HABERMAS, J. Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur poliüschen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp, 1996. , 1998 .

[26]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Learning about being critical , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[27]  Bonnie Mae Kaplan,et al.  Information systems research: Relevant theory and informed practice , 2004 .

[28]  Richard T. DeGeorge,et al.  The Ethics of Information Technology and Business , 2002 .

[29]  J. Habermas,et al.  Die Einbeziehung des Anderen : Studien zur politischen Theorie , 1996 .

[30]  Peter Aiken,et al.  Information systems development and data modeling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations , 1997 .

[31]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS , 1994, MIS Q..

[32]  David Knights,et al.  Corporate Strategy, Organizations, and Subjectivity: A Critique , 1991 .

[33]  Kathy McGrath In a Mood to Make Sense of Technology: A Longitudinal Study of Discursive Practices at the London Ambulance Service , 2002, Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology.

[34]  K. Gergen An invitation to social construction , 1999 .

[35]  Craig Locatis,et al.  Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology , 1994, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[36]  Kathy McGrath,et al.  Doing critical research in information systems: a case of theory and practice not informing each other * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[37]  Chrisanthi Avgerou Doing critical research in information systems: some further thoughts , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[38]  Carole Brooke,et al.  Critical perspectives on information systems: an impression of the research landscape , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[39]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Whose Discourse? A Comparison of the Foucauldian and Habermasian Concepts of Discourse in Critical IS Research , 2004, AMCIS.

[40]  Ana Viseu,et al.  Philosophy and computing: An introduction , 2001, CSOC.

[41]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Critical approaches to strategic management , 2003 .

[42]  Teresa S. Waring,et al.  From Critical Theory into Information Systems Practice: A Case Study of a Payroll-Personnel System , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[43]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  The human use of human beings - cybernetics and society , 1988 .

[44]  Minh Q. Huynh,et al.  The critical social theory of Jürgen Habermas and its implications for IS research , 2004 .

[45]  B. Sweetman Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy , 1997 .

[46]  R. Hirschheim INFORMATION SYSTEMS EPISTEMOLOGY: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[47]  Samantha Ashenden,et al.  Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory , 1999 .

[48]  T. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edition , 1970 .

[49]  Robert Bruce Kelsey,et al.  “A plea for tolerance in matters epistemological…” , 1995, SOEN.

[50]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems as rational discourse: an application of Habermas's theory of communicative action , 1988 .

[51]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Giving Voice to Feminist Projects in MIS Research , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[53]  W. Chua Radical Developments in Accounting Thought , 1986 .

[54]  J. Habermas The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[55]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems development and data modelling: conceptual and philosophical foundations , 1995 .

[56]  M. Foucault,et al.  Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison , 1977 .

[57]  D. Cecez-Kecmanovic Doing critical IS research: the question of methodology , 2001 .

[58]  Ann Taket,et al.  Doing Critical Management Research , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[59]  Briony J. Oates,et al.  Action Research: Time to Take a Turn? , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[60]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The Choice of Critical Information Systems Research , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[61]  Shoshana Zuboff In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[62]  J. Alfred French The business knowledge investment: building architected information , 1990 .

[63]  William Rehg,et al.  Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment , 1992 .

[64]  M. Foucault L'ordre du discours , 1973 .

[65]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[66]  G. Walsham Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[67]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[68]  John Mingers,et al.  Technical, Practical and Critical OR: Past, Present and Future? , 1992 .