Attentional re-training decreases attentional bias in heavy drinkers without generalization.

AIMS To examine whether alcohol-related attentional bias (AB) can be reduced by training heavy drinkers to attend to soft drinks as an alternative to alcohol. Diminishing AB is important because AB has been suggested to be a significant factor in the development, maintenance and relapse of addictive behaviours. AB was trained in a clinically relevant design, and we studied the generalization of this training. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: We assigned randomly 106 heavy drinking male college and university students to the attentional re-training (AR; modified visual-probe task) or control condition (standard visual-probe task). SETTING Laboratory at Maastricht University. MEASUREMENTS We measured the effects of AR on the visual-probe task with stimuli that were presented in the AR and with new stimuli, and on an alternative measure of AB, the flicker paradigm. We further measured effects on craving and preference for either an alcohol beverage or a soft drink. FINDINGS After AR, participants had learned to avoid alcohol stimuli and had developed an AB for soft drinks. This effect was restricted to stimuli used in the AR. The flicker task, where AB for alcohol was found in both the AR and control groups, was not affected by the AR. No effect was found on craving and the preference task. CONCLUSIONS Although heavy drinkers can learn to attend selectively to an alternative category for alcohol, a single AR is not sufficient to decrease symptoms of problem drinking.

[1]  Jane Epstein,et al.  Cognition, Emotion, and Psychopathology: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Directions , 2005 .

[2]  K. Mogg,et al.  A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. , 1998, Behaviour research and therapy.

[3]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[4]  T. Palfai,et al.  Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. , 2003, Behaviour research and therapy.

[5]  R. Wiers,et al.  Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers , 2002 .

[6]  J. Deakin,et al.  Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence , 2000, Psychological Medicine.

[7]  B. Jones,et al.  Alcohol-Related Words of Positive Affect are More Accessible in Social Drinkers' Memory Than are Other Words When Sip-Primed by Alcohol , 2000 .

[8]  R. Wiers,et al.  Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction , 2006 .

[9]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Implicit Attitude Measures: Consistency, Stability, and Convergent Validity , 2001, Psychological science.

[10]  J. Yiend,et al.  The experimental modification of processing biases , 2004 .

[11]  Karin Mogg,et al.  Selective processing of smoking-related cues in smokers: manipulation of deprivation level and comparison of three measures of processing bias , 2002, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[12]  T. Duka,et al.  Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers , 2001, Psychopharmacology.

[13]  K. Mogg,et al.  Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety. , 1997, Behaviour research and therapy.

[14]  R. Wiers,et al.  Challenging implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in young heavy drinkers. , 2005, Addiction.

[15]  H. White,et al.  Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. , 1989, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[16]  M. R. Kristian,et al.  Alcohol attentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers' treatment outcome. , 2002, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[17]  Ingmar H. A. Franken,et al.  Selective Memory for Alcohol Cues in Alcoholics and Its Relation to Craving , 2003, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[18]  W. Cox,et al.  The effects of alcohol cue exposure on non-dependent drinkers' attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli. , 2003, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[19]  K. Mogg,et al.  Attention to drug-related cues in drug abuse and addiction: component processes , 2006 .

[20]  R. Wiers,et al.  Assessing implicit alcohol associations with the Implicit Association Test: fact or artifact? , 2006, Addictive behaviors.

[21]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety , 2002 .

[22]  J. Fadardi,et al.  Motivational processes underlying implicit cognition in addiction , 2006 .

[23]  L. Sobell,et al.  Self-Report Issues in Alcohol Abuse: State of the Art and Future Directions , 1990 .

[24]  T. Palfai,et al.  The search for new ways to change implicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy drinkers. , 2006, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[25]  Michael A. Sayette,et al.  Cognitive theory and research. , 1999 .

[26]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  Asking questions about urges or cravings for cigarettes. , 1996 .

[27]  R. Wiers,et al.  High- and low-dose alcohol-related expectancies and the differential associations with drinking in male and female adolescents and young adults. , 1997, Addiction.

[28]  B. Jones,et al.  A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users. , 2003, Addiction.

[29]  Javad Salehi Fadardi,et al.  The addiction-stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Gillian Bruce,et al.  Alcohol-related attentional bias in problem drinkers with the flicker change blindness paradigm. , 2006, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[31]  K. Mogg,et al.  Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[32]  E. Levin,et al.  Binge pattern ethanol exposure in adolescent and adult rats: differential impact on subsequent responsiveness to ethanol. , 2000, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[33]  J. Hilton,et al.  Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Kenneth E. Leonard,et al.  Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism, 2nd ed. , 1999 .

[35]  R. Wiers,et al.  Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. , 2002, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[36]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Selective processing of visual alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholics: an approach-avoidance conflict? , 1997, Addictive behaviors.

[37]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. , 2002, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[38]  T. Duka,et al.  The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[39]  Olesya Govorun,et al.  An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  K. Berridge,et al.  Incentive-sensitization and addiction. , 2001, Addiction.

[41]  P. Conrod,et al.  To Drink or Not to Drink: The Role of Automatic and Controlled Cognitive Processes in the Etiology of Alcohol-Related Problems , 2006 .

[42]  K. Berridge,et al.  The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction , 1993, Brain Research Reviews.

[43]  K. Mogg,et al.  Trait anxiety, defensiveness and selective processing of threat: An investigation using two measures of attentional bias. , 2000 .

[44]  M. Field,et al.  Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol , 2005, Psychopharmacology.