Combining Analog Method and Ensemble Data Assimilation: Application to the Lorenz-63 Chaotic System

Nowadays, ocean and atmosphere sciences face a deluge of data from space, in situ monitoring as well as numerical simulations. The availability of these different data sources offers new opportunities, still largely underexploited, to improve the understanding, modeling, and reconstruction of geophysical dynamics. The classical way to reconstruct the space-time variations of a geophysical system from observations relies on data assimilation methods using multiple runs of the known dynamical model. This classical framework may have severe limitations including its computational cost, the lack of adequacy of the model with observed data, and modeling uncertainties. In this paper, we explore an alternative approach and develop a fully data-driven framework, which combines machine learning and statistical sampling to simulate the dynamics of complex system. As a proof concept, we address the assimilation of the chaotic Lorenz-63 model. We demonstrate that a nonparametric sampler from a catalog of historical datasets, namely, a nearest neighbor or analog sampler, combined with a classical stochastic data assimilation scheme, the ensemble Kalman filter and smoother, reaches state-of-the-art performances, without online evaluations of the physical model.

[1]  Michael Ghil,et al.  Advanced data assimilation in strongly nonlinear dynamical systems , 1994 .

[2]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[3]  Celeste Saulo,et al.  WRF Model Sensitivity to Choice of Parameterization over South America: Validation against Surface Variables , 2010 .

[4]  P. Leeuwen,et al.  Nonlinear data assimilation in geosciences: an extremely efficient particle filter , 2010 .

[5]  P. Marteau,et al.  L1-convergence of smoothing densities in non-parametric state space models , 2008 .

[6]  Luca Delle Monache,et al.  Probabilistic Weather Prediction with an Analog Ensemble , 2013 .

[7]  P. Marteau,et al.  L 1-convergence of smoothing densities in non-parametric state space models , 2005 .

[8]  J. Sprott Chaos and time-series analysis , 2001 .

[9]  Dinh-Tuan Pham,et al.  A New Approximate Solution of the Optimal Nonlinear Filter for Data Assimilation in Meteorology and Oceanography , 2008 .

[10]  H. V. D. Dool,et al.  Empirical Methods in Short-Term Climate Prediction , 2006 .

[11]  Eduardo Zorita,et al.  Reconstruction of high resolution atmospheric fields for Northern Europe using analog-upscaling , 2012 .

[12]  D. Nychka Data Assimilation” , 2006 .

[13]  Jon Louis Bentley,et al.  An Algorithm for Finding Best Matches in Logarithmic Expected Time , 1977, TOMS.

[14]  G. Evensen,et al.  Sequential Data Assimilation Techniques in Oceanography , 2003 .

[15]  N. B. Ingleby,et al.  The Met. Office global three‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme , 2000 .

[16]  François Lott,et al.  A new subgrid‐scale orographic drag parametrization: Its formulation and testing , 1997 .

[17]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  A Monte Carlo Implementation of the Nonlinear Filtering Problem to Produce Ensemble Assimilations and Forecasts , 1999 .

[18]  G. Evensen Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[19]  J. Dormand,et al.  A family of embedded Runge-Kutta formulae , 1980 .

[20]  Mathieu Vrac,et al.  Ensemble reconstruction of the atmospheric column from surface pressure using analogues , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[21]  B. Timbal,et al.  An estimate of future climate change for western France using a statistical downscaling technique , 2003 .

[22]  D. Pham Stochastic Methods for Sequential Data Assimilation in Strongly Nonlinear Systems , 2001 .

[23]  E. Lorenz Atmospheric Predictability as Revealed by Naturally Occurring Analogues , 1969 .