Comparative studies of chloride permeability, conductivity and salt-ponding tests of concrete containing different admixtures

Concrete modified with various chemical and mineral admixtures are gaining popularity as construction materials, but inclusion of admixtures raises questions about the validity of standard tests of transport properties and conductivity. To explore most representative tests, the present study has evaluated and compared transport properties by several methods: standard rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT), modified RCPT, electrical conductivity, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and salt-ponding tests. Three normal concretes and nine high-performance concretes including different combinations of mineral admixtures were investigated. Results show that the effects of heat generation in RCPT cells were dependent on the types and combinations of mineral admixtures, and that pore solutions had definite effects in RCPT results. The relatively expensive and difficult test of EIS can be replaced by one-minute RCPT and conductivity meter test. The correlations between salt-ponding tests and various RCPTs were found to be weak due to different mechanisms involved.

[1]  Mda Thomas,et al.  PREDICTION OF CHLORIDE PENETRATION IN CONCRETE , 2001 .

[2]  K. A. Snyder,et al.  Using Impedance Spectroscopy to Assess the Viability of the Rapid Chloride Test for Determining Concrete Conductivity , 2000, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[3]  R. D. Hooton,et al.  STUDY OF THE JOULE EFFECT ON RAPID CHLORIDE PERMEABILITY VALUES AND EVALUATION OF RELATED ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF CONCRETES , 2004 .

[4]  R. C. Joshi,et al.  Reexamination of ASTM C 1202 : Standard test method for electrical indication of concrete's ability to resist chloride ion penetration , 2000 .

[5]  Caijun Shi,et al.  Effect of mixing proportions of concrete on its electrical conductivity and the rapid chloride permeability test (ASTM C1202 or ASSHTO T277) results , 2004 .

[6]  K. Byfors,et al.  Influence of silica fume and flyash on chloride diffusion and pH values in cement paste , 1987 .

[7]  D S Lane SUPPLANTING THE RAPID CHLORIDE PERMEABILITY TEST WITH A QUICK MEASUREMENT OF CONCRETE CONDUCTIVITY , 2005 .

[8]  Marta Castellote,et al.  Relation between colourimetric chloride penetration depth and charge passed in migration tests of the type of standard ASTM C1202-91 , 1999 .

[9]  R. Doug Hooton,et al.  Re-evaluation of the AASHTO T259 90-day salt ponding test , 1999 .

[10]  Carmen Andrade,et al.  A comparison of chloride ion diffusion coefficients derived from concentration gradients and non-steady state accelerated ionic migration , 1996 .

[11]  Carmen Andrade,et al.  Calculation of chloride diffusion coefficients in concrete from ionic migration measurements , 1993 .

[12]  Jan Olek,et al.  Characterizing Enhanced Porosity Concrete using electrical impedance to predict acoustic and hydraulic performance , 2006 .