Conceptual Change from the Framework Theory Side of the Fence

We describe the main principles of the framework theory approach to conceptual change and briefly report on the results of a text comprehension study that investigated some of the hypotheses that derive from it. We claim that children construct a naive physics which is based on observation in the context of lay culture and which forms a relatively coherent conceptual system—i.e., a framework theory—that can be used as a basis for explanation and prediction of everyday phenomena. Learning science requires fundamental ontological, epistemological, and representational changes in naive physics. These conceptual changes take a long time to be achieved, giving rise to fragmentation and synthetic conceptions. We also argue that both fragmentation and synthetic conceptions can be explained to result from learners’ attempts assimilate scientific information into their existing but incompatible naive physics.

[1]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  A bird's-eye view of the "pieces" vs "coherence" controversy (from the "pieces" side of the fence") , 2013 .

[2]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions , 2004 .

[3]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  How Many Decimals Are There Between Two Fractions? Aspects of Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Rational Numbers and Their Notation , 2010 .

[4]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[5]  S. Carey,et al.  The Epigenesis of mind : essays on biology and cognition , 1991 .

[6]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science , 1992 .

[7]  Yujing Ni,et al.  Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias , 2005 .

[8]  F. Keil Constraints on knowledge and cognitive development. , 1981 .

[9]  Knowledge Structure Coherence in Turkish Students' Understanding of Force. , 2009 .

[10]  Steve Graham,et al.  APA Educational Psychology Handbook. , 2011 .

[11]  M. Chi,et al.  Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-Based Conceptions , 2000 .

[12]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth, sun, and moon: Indian children's cosmologies , 1996 .

[13]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  FOCUS ARTICLE: Implications of Research on Children's Learning for Standards and Assessment: A Proposed Learning Progression for Matter and the Atomic-Molecular Theory , 2006 .

[14]  M. Limón On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal , 2001 .

[15]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Are secondary school students still hampered by the natural number bias? A reaction time study on fraction comparison tasks , 2013 .

[16]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[17]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. , 2007 .

[18]  S. Vosniadou The Framework Theory Approach to the Problem of Conceptual Change , 2009 .

[19]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Extending the conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching , 2004 .

[20]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Two Kinds and Four Sub-Types of Misconceived Knowledge, Ways to Change it, and the Learning Outcomes , 2013 .

[21]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Learning and Teaching about Matter in Grades K–8: When Should the Atomic-Molecular Theory be Introduced? , 2009 .

[22]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[24]  J. Clement The Role of Explanatory Models in Teaching for Conceptual Change , 2008 .

[25]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Intentional Conceptual Change , 2003 .

[26]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science , 2001 .

[27]  Barbara J. Guzzetti,et al.  Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education , 1993 .

[28]  S. Pulos,et al.  Children's cosmographies: Understanding the earth's shape and gravity , 1983 .

[29]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[30]  Giyoo Hatano,et al.  When is conceptual change intended? A cognitive-sociocultural view , 2003 .

[31]  Lucia Mason,et al.  On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. , 2008 .

[32]  Kenneth T. V. Grattan,et al.  Introduction to special issue on measurement and instrumentation science , 1994 .

[33]  P. Slezak Developmental Shifts in Children's Categorizations of the Earth , 2005 .

[34]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Reframing the Conceptual Change Approach in Learning and Instruction , 2007 .

[35]  Jennifer B. Esterly,et al.  Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force , 2004 .

[36]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards , 1987 .

[38]  K. Crowley,et al.  Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings. , 2001 .

[39]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  International handbook of research on conceptual change , 2013 .

[40]  M. Chi Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift , 2009 .

[41]  B. Reiser,et al.  Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .

[42]  H. Wellman The Child's Theory of Mind , 1990 .

[43]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[44]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Reconsidering the role of artifacts in reasoning: Children's understanding of the globe as a model of the earth , 2005 .

[45]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[46]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding , 2007 .

[47]  E. Spelke,et al.  Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change , 1994 .

[48]  R. Baillargeon A model of physical reasoning in infancy , 1995 .

[49]  David Hammer,et al.  Conceptual change in physics , 2013 .

[50]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Model building for conceptual change , 2005, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[51]  S. Carey The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[52]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Modes of Knowing and Ways of Reasoning in Elementary Astronomy. , 2004 .

[53]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[54]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Knowledge Building as a Mediator of Conflict in Conceptual Change , 1997 .

[55]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Comparison of Students' Knowledge Structure Coherence and Understanding of Force in the Philippines, Turkey, China, Mexico, and the United States , 2011 .

[56]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Conceptual Change in Physics and Physics-Related Epistemological Beliefs: A Relationship under Scrutiny , 2006 .

[57]  J. Nussbaum Children's conceptions of the earth as a cosmic body: A cross age study , 1979 .

[58]  J. Novak,et al.  An assessment of children's concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews , 1976 .

[59]  H. Wellman,et al.  Cognitive development: foundational theories of core domains. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[60]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[61]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Using Theory of Mind to Promote Conceptual Change in Science , 2014 .

[62]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change , 2004 .