The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004)

Energy transitions to sustainability receive much interest in politics and science. Using a socio-technical and multi-level theory on transitions, this article draws important lessons from a long-term analysis of the Dutch electricity system. The article analyses technical developments, changes in rules and visions, and social networks that support and oppose renewable options. The article is multi-level because it looks at novel renewable energy technologies and structural trends in the existing electricity regime. The analysis shows that an energy transition, with roots in the 1960s and 1970s, is already occurring, but driven mainly by liberalisation and Europeanisation. Environmental aspects have become part of this ongoing transition, but do not form its main driver. Many barriers exist for a sustainability transition, but there are also some opportunities. A long-term analysis of renewable niche-innovation trajectories (wind, biomass, PV) provides lessons about socio-technical dynamics, problems and windows of opportunity.

[1]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[2]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability , 2004 .

[3]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technological Change , 2019, World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains.

[4]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches , 2001 .

[5]  Rob P. J. M. Raven,et al.  Multi-Regime Interactions in the Dutch Energy Sector: The Case of Combined Heat and Power Technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000 , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  Gpj Geert Verbong.  Dutch power relations: from German occupation to the French connection , 2006 .

[7]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Winds of Change:: Corporate Strategy, Climate change and Oil Multinationals , 2001 .

[8]  Ruud Smits,et al.  Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark , 2004 .

[9]  Mark T. van Wees,et al.  Green electricity policies in the Netherlands: an analysis of policy decisions , 2006 .

[10]  Geert Verbong,et al.  Een kwestie van lange adem : de geschiedenis van duurzame energie in Nederland , 2001 .

[11]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[12]  Gpj Geert Verbong,et al.  Elektriciteitsvoorziening, overheid en industrie 1949-1970 , 2000 .

[13]  U. Cantner,et al.  Change, transformation and development , 2003 .

[14]  J. Kooiman,et al.  Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions , 1993 .

[15]  F. Geels.  Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[16]  John Perlin,et al.  From Space to Earth: The Story of Solar Electricity , 1999 .

[17]  Tariq Banuri,et al.  Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead , 2002 .

[18]  Johan Schot,et al.  Radical Innovation as a Multilevel Process: Introducing Floating Grain Elevators in the Port of Rotterdam , 2005 .

[19]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[20]  W. Walker.  Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations , 2000 .

[21]  van Qc Rinie Est,et al.  Winds of change: A comparative study of the politics of wind energy innovation in California and Denmark , 1999 .

[22]  G. P. J. Verbong,et al.  Different visions of power the introduction of nuclear power in the Netherlands 1955-1970 , 1999 .

[23]  Kornelis Blok.  The development of industrial CHP in the Netherlands , 1993 .

[24]  R. Raven.  Strategic Niche Management for Biomass , 2008 .

[25]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[26]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Lock-in and change: Distributed generation in Denmark in a long-term perspective , 2006 .

[27]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy , 2005 .

[28]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions and system innovations , 2005 .

[29]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[30]  R. Garud,et al.  Path dependence and creation , 2003 .

[31]  G. P. J. Verbong.  Wind Power in the Netherlands, 1970–1995 , 1999 .

[32]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[33]  Jim Watson,et al.  Selection environments, flexibility and the success of the gas turbine , 2004 .

[34]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[35]  Aad Correljé,et al.  Natural Gas in the Netherlands. From Cooperation to Competition , 2003 .

[36]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[37]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .

[38]  Leo Jansen,et al.  Sustainable Technology Development , 2000 .