Acute Toxicity Prediction to Threatened and Endangered Species Using Interspecies Correlation Estimation (ICE) Models.

Evaluating contaminant sensitivity of threatened and endangered (listed) species and protectiveness of chemical regulations often depends on toxicity data for commonly tested surrogate species. The U.S. EPA's Internet application Web-ICE is a suite of Interspecies Correlation Estimation (ICE) models that can extrapolate species sensitivity to listed taxa using least-squares regressions of the sensitivity of a surrogate species and a predicted taxon (species, genus, or family). Web-ICE was expanded with new models that can predict toxicity to over 250 listed species. A case study was used to assess protectiveness of genus and family model estimates derived from either geometric mean or minimum taxa toxicity values for listed species. Models developed from the most sensitive value for each chemical were generally protective of the most sensitive species within predicted taxa, including listed species, and were more protective than geometric means models. ICE model estimates were compared to HC5 values derived from Species Sensitivity Distributions for the case study chemicals to assess protectiveness of the two approaches. ICE models provide robust toxicity predictions and can generate protective toxicity estimates for assessing contaminant risk to listed species.

[1]  T M Martin,et al.  MOAtox: A comprehensive mode of action and acute aquatic toxicity database for predictive model development. , 2015, Aquatic toxicology.

[2]  S. Dyer,et al.  Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  R. Knapp,et al.  Multiple stressors and amphibian declines: dual impacts of pesticides and fish on yellow-legged frogs. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  S. Raimondo,et al.  Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[6]  Deborah N. Vivian,et al.  Standardizing acute toxicity data for use in ecotoxicology models: influence of test type, life stage, and concentration reporting , 2009, Ecotoxicology.

[7]  F. J. Dwyer,et al.  Assessing Contaminant Sensitivity of Endangered and Threatened Aquatic Species: Part I. Acute Toxicity of Five Chemicals , 2005, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[8]  S. Raimondo,et al.  Influence of taxonomic relatedness and chemical mode of action in acute interspecies estimation models for aquatic species. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Mace G Barron,et al.  Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models , 2014, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[10]  L. Burgoon,et al.  Molecular target sequence similarity as a basis for species extrapolation to assess the ecological risk of chemicals with known modes of action. , 2013, Aquatic toxicology.

[11]  P. Mineau,et al.  Estimation of chemical toxicity to wildlife species using interspecies correlation models. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  S. Dyer,et al.  Comparison of species sensitivity distributions derived from interspecies correlation models to distributions used to derive water quality criteria. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  F. J. Dwyer,et al.  Acute toxicity of copper, ammonia, and chlorine to glochidia and juveniles of freshwater mussels (unionidae) , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[14]  T. Augspurger,et al.  Assessing variability in chemical acute toxicity of unionid mussels: Influence of intra‐ and interlaboratory testing, life stage, and species , 2016, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[15]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Importance of toxicokinetics for interspecies variation in sensitivity to chemicals. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  F. J. Dwyer,et al.  Contaminant sensitivity of threatened and endangered fishes compared to standard surrogate species , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[17]  Deborah N. Vivian,et al.  Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.