Methodology for determining key internal business processes based on critical success factors: A case study in furniture industry

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology to help manufacturers determine and rank key internal business processes based on critical success factors (CSF).Design/methodology/approach – First, company CSF and key performance measures were determined based on vision, mission and strategic objectives statements. Second, most important CSF were prioritized according to rating scores such as cost savings, necessary improvement, and own discretion using a balanced scoreboard procedure and a prioritization matrix. Third, CSF were related to internal business processes based on “strength of relationship” in order to define the most critical internal processes. Fourth, possible differences in the perception of CSF and strategic objectives among different management levels were compared. Fifth, the methodology was validated in three furniture manufacturing companies.Findings – It was found that when a firm is missing vision or mission statements, it is imperative to define them before CSF can ...

[1]  J. Rockart Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[2]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  Planning, Critical Success Factors, and Management's Information Requirements , 1980, MIS Q..

[3]  R. Anthony,et al.  Management Control Systems , 2020, Management Control Systems and Tools for Internationalization Success.

[4]  Sumit Sircar,et al.  Critical Success Factors and Small Business , 1984 .

[5]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[6]  R. Camp Business process benchmarking : finding and implementing best practices , 1995 .

[7]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[8]  Christopher K. Bart,et al.  Developing Mission Statements which Work , 1996 .

[9]  Chiranjeev Kohli,et al.  Corporate identity: The role of mission statements , 1997 .

[10]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  A comparative study of the prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function deployment , 1998 .

[11]  R. Lau Critical factors for achieving manufacturing flexibility , 1999 .

[12]  Geoff Buxey,et al.  Strategies in an era of global competition , 2000 .

[13]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[14]  Paul Close,et al.  Manufacturing change: The role of performance evaluation and control systems , 2000 .

[15]  Andrew H. Paterson,et al.  Manufacturing operations and strategic flexibility: survey and cases , 2000 .

[16]  Gopal K. Kanji,et al.  Performance measurement system , 2002 .