Influence of module configuration on total economics during ultrafiltration at high concentration

The influence of module configuration on the ultrafiltration of highly concentrated fluids in tubular membrane plants was investigated. Previous work has shown that frictional pressure drop in the feed flow channel can have a significant influence on the performance when treating viscous fluids. In the present study, three module alternatives were compared: polymeric membranes connected either in series or parallel, and a ceramic membrane element with all flow channels in parallel. An economic evaluation was performed of an additional stage in the ultrafiltration plant at Stora Enso Nymolla pulp and paper mill treating bleach plant effluent. A parametric study in a laboratory equipment provided information on how the flux and frictional pressure drop vary with transmembrane pressure and cross-flow velocity along the membrane. A full-size stage was scaled-up from the experimental data obtained from the laboratory experiments. All three alternatives were shown to be economically viable. The cost of the polymeric membrane in parallel configuration (€70 200 per year) was lowest, making it the most attractive alternative. It was shown that the cross-flow velocity had a significant effect on the performance and hence on the economics of the plant. For all three alternatives, the lowest cross-flow velocity employed (2 m/s) gave the best performance.

[1]  D. Pepper,et al.  Concentration of tomato juice and other fruit juices by reverse osmosis , 1985 .

[2]  Anna-Karin Nordin,et al.  Flux decline along the flow channel in tubular ultrafiltration modules , 2009 .

[3]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook , 1998 .

[4]  T. Ochiumi,et al.  Treatment of paper-plant wastewater by ultrafiltration: a case history , 1985 .

[5]  Ricard Garcia-Valls,et al.  Processing of black liquors by UF/NF ceramic membranes , 2005 .

[6]  Y. Imamura,et al.  Treatment of highly fouling waste waters with tubular membrane systems , 1984 .

[7]  A. James,et al.  Efficiency of ultrafiltration in the separation of whey suspensions using a tubular zirconia membrane , 2008 .

[8]  D. Peričin,et al.  The possibility for improvement of ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of an enzyme solution , 2007 .

[9]  J. M. Benito,et al.  Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of anionic and nonionic surfactant solutions , 2005 .

[10]  Anna-Karin Nordin,et al.  Case study of an ultrafiltration plant treating bleach plant effluent from a pulp and paper mill , 2006 .

[11]  Ida De Michelis,et al.  Removal of heavy metals by surfactant-enhanced ultrafiltration from wastewaters , 2007 .

[12]  J. M. Benito,et al.  Development of a new high porosity ceramic membrane for the treatment of bilge water , 2007 .

[13]  Jean-Louis Maubois,et al.  Current developments of microfiltration technology in the dairy industry , 2000 .

[14]  James W. Murdock Fluid mechanics and its applications , 1976 .