Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera.

UNLABELLED A whole-body 3-dimensional PET scanner using gadolinium oxyorthosilicate (GSO) crystals has been designed to achieve high sensitivity and reduced patient scanning time. This scanner has a diameter of 82.0 cm and an axial field of view of 18 cm without interplane septa. The detector comprises of 4 x 6 x 20 mm(3) GSO crystals coupled via an optically continuous light guide to an array of 420 photomultiplier tubes (39-mm diameter) in a hexagonal arrangement. The patient port diameter is 56 cm, and 2.86-cm (1.125 in.) thick lead shielding is used to fill in the region up to the detector ring. METHODS Performance measurements on the scanner were made using the National Electrical Manufactures Association (NEMA) NU 2-2001 procedures. Additional counting rate measurements with a large phantom were performed to evaluate imaging characteristics for heavier patients. The image-quality torso phantom with hot or cold spheres was also measured as a function of counting rate to evaluate different techniques for randoms and scatter subtraction as well as to determine an optimum imaging time. RESULTS The transverse and axial resolutions near the center are 5.5 and 5.6 mm, respectively. The absolute sensitivity of this scanner measured with a 70-cm-long line source is 4.36 cps/kBq, whereas the scatter fraction is 40% with a 20 x 70 cm line source cylinder. For the same cylinder, the peak noise equivalent count (NEC) rate of 30 kcps at an activity concentration of 9.25 kBq/mL (0.25 micro Ci/mL) leads to a 7% increase in the peak NEC value. A significant reduction in the peak NEC is observed with a larger 35 x 70 cm line source cylinder. Image-quality measurements show that the small 10-mm sphere in the NEMA NU 2-2001 image-quality phantom is clearly visible in a scan time of 3 min, and there is no noticeable degradation in image contrast at high activity levels. CONCLUSION This whole-body scanner represents a new generation of 3D, high-sensitivity, and high-performance PET cameras capable of producing high-quality images in <30 min for a full patient scan. The use of a pixelated GSO Anger-logic detector leads to a high-sensitivity scanner design with good counting rate capability due to the reduced light spread in the detector and fast decay time of GSO. The light collection over the detector is fairly uniform, leading to a good energy resolution and, thus, reduced scatter in the collected data due to a tight energy gate.

[1]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography , 1980 .

[2]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Treatment of axial data in three-dimensional PET. , 1987, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  T D Cradduck,et al.  National electrical manufacturers association , 1983, Journal of the A.I.E.E..

[6]  J S Karp,et al.  Performance of a whole-body PET scanner using curve-plate NaI(Tl) detectors. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  G Muehllehner,et al.  Singles transmission in volume-imaging PET with a 137Cs source. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Performance standards in positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Evemt Localization in a Continuous Scintillation Detector Using Digital Processing , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  Dale L. Bailey,et al.  A method for measuring the absolute sensitivity of positron emission tomographic scanners , 1991, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  S. Kubota,et al.  Cerium doped GSO scintillators and its application to position sensitive detectors , 1989 .

[13]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Design and performance of the HEAD PENN-PET scanner , 1994 .

[14]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Continuous-slice PENN-PET: a positron tomograph with volume imaging capability. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  G Muehllehner,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging characteristics of the HEAD PENN-PET scanner. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Performance of a brain PET camera based on anger-logic gadolinium oxyorthosilicate detectors. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Application of the row action maximum likelihood algorithm with spherical basis functions to clinical PET imaging , 2001 .

[18]  S. Surti,et al.  Count-rate dependent event mispositioning and NEC in PET , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[19]  Michael E Casey,et al.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  R D Badawi,et al.  Randoms variance reduction in 3D PET. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  M.E. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Assessment of image quality with a fast fully 3D reconstruction algorithm , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[23]  Samuel Matej,et al.  3D-FRP: direct Fourier reconstruction with Fourier reprojection for fully 3-D PET , 2000 .