A framework of theoretical lenses and strategic purposes to describe relationships among firm environmental strategy, financial performance, and environmental performance

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the type of theoretical lens and strategic purpose impacts the relationships among firm environmental strategy, financial performance, and environmental performance. Design/methodology/approach - This is a theoretical paper which first investigates three constructs: firm environmental strategy, environmental performance, and economic performance. Scholars have argued for different relationships among the three constructs. The paper then discusses two theoretical lenses (strategic choice and the resource-based view) and two strategic purposes (stakeholder and shareholder) used in the literature. The paper argues that the type of theoretical lens and strategic purpose will impact the way the three constructs (firm environmental strategy, financial performance, and environmental performance) are arranged. Findings - The paper provides a two-by-two matrix distinguishing between theoretical lens and strategic purpose. The paper argues that the specific choice of theoretical lens and strategic purpose helps define the way firm environmental strategy, financial performance, and environmental performance are arranged. Originality/value - As different scholars have argued for different relationships among the three constructs, this paper provides a framework that could help justify the seemingly paradoxical relationships. The paper concludes with ideas for future research on these issues.

[1]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[2]  Nuria E. Hurtado-Torres,et al.  Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  B. Husted,et al.  Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance* , 2006 .

[4]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[5]  T. Douglas,et al.  Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment , 1998 .

[6]  Harrie Vredenburg,et al.  Sustainability and the Corporation , 1996 .

[7]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[8]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[9]  Robert J. Firenze,et al.  Organizational performance and environmental consciousness: an empirical study , 1998 .

[10]  Naomi S. Soderstrom,et al.  Measuring corporate environmental performance , 1998 .

[11]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  A Test of the Theory of Exhaustible Resources , 1991 .

[12]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[13]  Frsl Correlli Barnett Chair Ma.  Strategy and Society , 1976 .

[14]  James J. Cordeiro,et al.  Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts , 1997 .

[15]  B. Kleiner,et al.  New Developments in Measuring Corporate Performance , 1995 .

[16]  J. Barney.  Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[17]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OPERATIONAL PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE AMONG EARLY ADOPTERS OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CHINESE MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES , 2004 .

[18]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[19]  Richard R. Johnson,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Sustainability Strategies at Walden Paddlers, Inc , 2000, Interfaces.

[20]  M. Starik,et al.  Weaving An Integrated Web: Multilevel and Multisystem Perspectives of Ecologically Sustainable Organizations , 1995 .

[21]  Glen Taylor,et al.  Globalization and the environment: Strategies for international voluntary environmental initiatives , 2002 .

[22]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[23]  Ann Goodman,et al.  Implementing Sustainability in Service Operations at Scandic Hotels , 2000, Interfaces.

[24]  Institutionalizing environmental performance in US industry: Is it happening and what if it does not? , 1998 .

[25]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[26]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value , 2000 .

[27]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[28]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Industry Self‐Regulation: A Game‐Theoretic Typology of Strategic Voluntary Compliance , 2003 .

[29]  Noan Walley,et al.  It's not easy being green , 1994 .

[30]  Alyson Warhurst,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and the case of Summitville mine , 2000 .

[31]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[32]  D. Rondinelli,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution , 1998 .

[33]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  A General Dynamic Capability: Does it Propagate Business and Social Competencies in the Retail Food Industry?* , 2006 .

[34]  S. Livesey,et al.  Transparent and Caring Corporations? , 2002 .

[35]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[36]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  Policy modes, firms and the natural environment , 2004 .

[37]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Environmental Management Systems: Opportunities for Improved Environmental and Business Strategy , 2000 .

[38]  Petra Christmann.  Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[39]  Julie L. Hass.  ENVIRONMENTAL (‘GREEN’) MANAGEMENT TYPOLOGIES: AN EVALUATION, OPERATIONALIZATION AND EMPIRICAL DEVELOPMENT , 1996 .

[40]  Frances Cairncross,et al.  Costing the Earth , 1991 .

[41]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[42]  H. R. Fogler,et al.  A Note on Social Responsibility and Stock Valuation , 1975 .

[43]  T. Keane.  Exploring stakeholder emotional intelligence , 2006 .

[44]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[45]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance , 1999 .

[46]  Michael L. Barnett.  Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[47]  Tom Connor,et al.  The resource‐based view of strategy and its value to practising managers , 2002 .

[48]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[49]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[50]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance , 2007 .

[51]  Peter Franklin.  Guest editorial : elephants, metaphors and tropes in strategic management theory: implications for a strategy for strategy? , 2002 .

[52]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  B Clemens,et al.  Changing environmental strategies over time: an empirical study of the steel industry in the United States. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[54]  Predicting organisational objectives: role of stakeholder influence and volatility of environmental sectors , 1998 .

[55]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[56]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Predicting the Cost of Environmental Management System Adoption: The Role of Capabilities, Resources and Ownership Structure , 2006 .

[57]  Robert D. Klassen,et al.  Exploring the linkage between investment in manufacturing and environmental technologies , 2000 .

[58]  J. Child.  Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect , 1997 .

[59]  David L. Levy.  The environmental practices and performance of transnational corporations , 1995 .

[60]  A. Marcus,et al.  Introduction to the Special Research Forum on the Management of Organizations in the Natural Environment: A Field Emerging From Multiple Paths, With Many Challenges Ahead , 2000 .

[61]  J. Barney.  Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1986 .

[62]  Sanjay Sharma.  Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[63]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[64]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[65]  Andrew A. King.  Avoiding Ecological Surprise: Lessons From Long-Standing Communities , 1995 .

[66]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Process Analysis , 1981 .

[67]  Thomas J. Douglas,et al.  Does coercion drive firms to adopt 'voluntary' green initiatives? Relationships among coercion, superior firm resources, and voluntary green initiatives , 2006 .

[68]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1999 .

[69]  Douglas J. Lober,et al.  Evaluating the Environmental Performance of Corporations , 1996 .

[70]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Greener and cleaner? The signaling accuracy of U.S. voluntary environmental programs , 2005 .

[71]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  An activity based management methodology for evaluating business processes for environmental sustainability , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[72]  Igor H.Ansoff.  Strategic Management , 1979 .

[73]  L. Preston,et al.  Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View , 2002 .

[74]  Nicole Darnall.  Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification , 2006 .

[75]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis , 1988 .

[76]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[77]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Relationships between solid waste management performance and environmental practice adoption in Welsh small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) , 2007 .

[78]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[79]  Prescott C. Ensign,et al.  A resource‐based view of interrelationships among organizational groups in the diversified firm , 2004 .

[80]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Special Theory Forum The Resource-Based Model of the Firm: Origins, Implications, and Prospects , 1991 .

[81]  M. Friedman.  The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[82]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  The Regulation Dilemma: Cooperation and Conflict in Environmental Governance , 2004 .

[83]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .