Academic Achievement and Its Impact on Friend Dynamics

Academic achievement in adolescence is a key determinant of future educational and occupational success. Friends play an important role in the educational process. They provide support and resources and can both encourage and discourage academic achievement. As a result, the friends adolescents make may help to maintain and exacerbate inequality if friends are sorted on the basis of academic achievement. These observations prompt the question: How does academic achievement affect the friendship ties made? Using data from the high schools in the Add Health saturated sample, the author models network change using a stochastic actor-based Markov model for the co-evolution of networks and behavior. This model is carried out at the school level for each of the high schools included in the saturated sample. Results show that in the most typical American schools, similarity in academic achievement is an important and consistent predictor of friendship ties in a dynamic context. High-achieving students are more likely to extend ties to other high-achieving students, net of other sociodemographic, network, and proximity characteristics, while low-achieving students are more likely to extend ties to other low-achieving students. Adolescents respond to changes in academic achievement by changing their friendship ties.

[1]  W. Shrum Friendship in School: Gender and Racial Homophily. , 1988 .

[2]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[3]  Lutz K. Berkner,et al.  Access to Postsecondary Education for the 1992 High School Graduates. Postsecondary Education Descriptive Analysis Reports. Statistical Analysis Report. , 1997 .

[4]  Maureen T. Hallinan,et al.  The Formation of Intransitive Friendships , 1990 .

[5]  Glen H. Elder,et al.  Adolescent Friendships as Academic Resources: The Intersection of Friendship, Race, and School Disadvantage , 2003 .

[6]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Manual for SIENA version 2.1 , 2005 .

[7]  Catherine Riegle-Crumb,et al.  The Role of Gender and Friendship in Advanced Course Taking , 2006, Sociology of education.

[8]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  The prediction of interpersonal attraction , 1956 .

[9]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[10]  Kenneth A. Frank,et al.  The Social Dynamics of Mathematics Coursetaking in High School1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  R. Kapuściński,et al.  A brief history of balance through time , 1996 .

[12]  S. Schachter The Psychology Of Affiliation , 1959 .

[13]  S. Feld The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Grace S Kao,et al.  Racial and Ethnic Stratification in Educational Achievement and Attainment , 2003 .

[15]  Catherine M. Hombo,et al.  NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance. , 2000 .

[16]  C. Steglich,et al.  Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents’ friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption , 2006 .

[17]  A. Bowker Predicting Friendship Stability During Early Adolescence , 2004 .

[18]  D. Hargreaves,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Education , 1972 .

[19]  T. Snijders,et al.  A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution , 2003 .

[20]  Carolyn J. Anderson,et al.  A p* primer: logit models for social networks , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[21]  A. Gamoran,et al.  American Schooling and Educational Inequality: A Forecast for the 21st Century. , 2001 .

[22]  J. Moody Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Joseph Lee Rodgers,et al.  Adolescent Sexual Behavior and Friendship Choice , 1984 .

[24]  C. Steglich,et al.  DYNAMIC NETWORKS AND BEHAVIOR: SEPARATING SELECTION FROM INFLUENCE: separating selection from influence , 2010 .

[25]  P. Blau Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure , 1978 .

[26]  Jere M. Cohen Sources of peer group homogeneity. , 1977 .

[27]  D. Kandel Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[29]  T. Snijders The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[30]  T. Snijders,et al.  Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior , 2007 .

[31]  Samuel R. Lucas,et al.  Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools , 2001 .

[32]  Mary E. Campbell,et al.  Beyond Black and White: The Present and Future of Multiracial Friendship Segregation , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[33]  F. Stokman,et al.  Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network , 2003 .

[34]  R. Leenders,et al.  Structure and influence : statistical models for the dynamics of actor attributes, network structure, and their interdependence , 1995 .

[35]  Grace Kao,et al.  School Racial Composition and Adolescent Racial Homophily , 2000 .

[36]  Maureen T. Hallinan,et al.  The Effects of Sex, Race, and Achievement on Schoolchildren's Friendships , 1979 .

[37]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Friendship Networks Through Time: An Actor-Oriented Dynamic Statistical Network Model , 1999, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[38]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Friendship and Delinquency: Selection and Influence Processes in Early Adolescence , 2010 .