Comparison between different approaches to the biomagnetic inverse problem — workshop report

In view of the eminent importance models have for the interpretation of biomagnetic data, it is a matter of concern that a generally accepted strategy for the analysis of experimental data is not in sight. It seems evident that the future prospects of biomagnetic investigations as compared to other functional imaging techniques (e.g. PET, fMRI) will decisively depend on the success of new data analysis techniques. The necessity to develop new modeling strategies is underlined by the fact that the availability of whole-head magnetometer devices necessitates the development of better models: First, more realistic volume conductor models are required, because simple models like a homogeneous sphere are not capable of providing a good approximation if the measurement area Covers the whole head rather than a relatively small area. Second, the number of sources to be considered generally increases with increasing measurement area so that simple source models like the equivalent current dipole become more and more obsolete.

[1]  C D Tesche,et al.  Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[3]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Scherg,et al.  Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  J. C. Mosher,et al.  Subspace Angles: A Metric for Comparisons in EEG and MEG , 2000 .

[6]  G. Wahba Spline models for observational data , 1990 .

[7]  R. Greenblatt Probabilistic reconstruction of multiple sources in the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem , 1993 .

[8]  D. B. Kynor,et al.  A Weighting Matrix to Remove Depth Bias in the Linear Biomagnetic Inverse Problem with Application to Cardiology , 2000 .

[9]  石黒 真木夫,et al.  Akaike information criterion statistics , 1986 .

[10]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Global Optimization in the Localization of Brain Activity , 2000 .

[12]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  New Method for the Study of Spontaneous Brain Activity. , 1988 .

[13]  G. Kitagawa,et al.  Akaike Information Criterion Statistics , 1988 .

[14]  R.M. Leahy,et al.  EEG and MEG source localization using recursively applied (RAP) MUSIC , 1996, Conference Record of The Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[15]  C D Tesche,et al.  Characterizing the local oscillatory content of spontaneous cortical activity during mental imagery. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.