Functional trait variation along environmental gradients in temperate and Mediterranean trees

Aim Characterizing the variation of functional traits in nature is a first step towards linking environmental changes to changes in ecosystem function. Here we aim to characterize the spatial variability of major plant functional traits along wide environmental gradients in Mediterranean and temperate forests, and assess to what extent this variability differs between two dominant families in Northern Hemisphere forests: Fagaceae and Pinaceae. Location Catalonia (north-east Iberian Peninsula). Methods Four functional traits were selected to incorporate information on both the leaf and the wood economic spectra: maximum tree height (Hmax), wood density (WD), leaf mass per area (LMA) and nitrogen content of leaves (Nmass). We quantified the variance distribution of each functional trait across three nested ecological scales: population, species and family. Through such scales, we explored the spatial variation of functional traits through climatic and biotic gradients, as well as the covariation among traits. Results Functional trait variability was distributed across all the ecological scales considered, but mostly at the family level, with functional traits differing markedly between Fagaceae and Pinaceae. Within families, variation in functional traits was similar or higher within species than between species. The spatial variability in functional traits was related to biotic and abiotic gradients, although this effect was quantitatively small compared with differences between families. Covariation among functional traits was not necessarily conserved across ecological scales. Trait covariation across all species was structured along the Hmax−WD and LMA−Nmass axes, but this structure was partially lost within families, where variation was mostly structured along the Hmax−LMA and WD−Nmass axes. Main conclusions Intraspecific variation emerges as a fundamental component of functional trait structure along wide environmental gradients. Understanding the sources of intraspecific variation, as well as how it contributes to community assembly and ecosystem functioning, thus becomes a primary research question.

[1]  J. Sperry,et al.  Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure , 2001, Oecologia.

[2]  L. Vesterdal,et al.  Influences of evergreen gymnosperm and deciduous angiosperm tree species on the functioning of temperate and boreal forests , 2015, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[3]  U. Niinemets Is there a species spectrum within the world-wide leaf economics spectrum? Major variations in leaf functional traits in the Mediterranean sclerophyll Quercus ilex. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[4]  Jens Kattge,et al.  The emergence and promise of functional biogeography , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia,et al.  Which is a better predictor of plant traits: temperature or precipitation? , 2014 .

[6]  Intraspecific variability in functional traits matters: case study of Scots pine , 2014, Oecologia.

[7]  B. Potts,et al.  Genetic divergence in forest trees: understanding the consequences of climate change , 2014 .

[8]  H. Lambers,et al.  Trait correlation networks: a whole-plant perspective on the recently criticized leaf economic spectrum. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[9]  B. Enquist,et al.  Revisiting Darwin's hypothesis: Does greater intraspecific variability increase species' ecological breadth? , 2014, American journal of botany.

[10]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Large-scale recruitment limitation in Mediterranean pines: the role of Quercus ilex and forest successional advance as key regional drivers , 2014 .

[11]  D. Wardle,et al.  The within‐species leaf economic spectrum does not predict leaf litter decomposability at either the within‐species or whole community levels , 2013 .

[12]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Contrasting trait syndromes in angiosperms and conifers are associated with different responses of tree growth to temperature on a large scale , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[13]  Raphaël Martin,et al.  Disentangling Coordination among Functional Traits Using an Individual-Centred Model: Impact on Plant Performance at Intra- and Inter-Specific Levels , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  B. Enquist,et al.  Intra-specific and inter-specific variation in specific leaf area reveal the importance of abiotic and biotic drivers of species diversity across elevation and latitude , 2013 .

[15]  J. Retana,et al.  Patterns and drivers of regeneration of tree species in forests of peninsular Spain , 2013 .

[16]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Photosynthetically relevant foliar traits correlating better on a mass vs an area basis: of ecophysiological relevance or just a case of mathematical imperatives and statistical quicksand? , 2013, The New phytologist.

[17]  P. Reich,et al.  Understanding ecological variation across species: area-based vs mass-based expression of leaf traits. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[18]  S. Pacala,et al.  Global Leaf Trait Relationships: Mass, Area, and the Leaf Economics Spectrum , 2013, Science.

[19]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[20]  Jian-Kang Zhu,et al.  Rapid phosphatidic acid accumulation in response to low temperature stress in Arabidopsis is generated through diacylglycerol kinase , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[21]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions , 2013 .

[22]  David A. Coomes,et al.  Elegance versus Speed: Examining the Competition between Conifer and Angiosperm Trees , 2012, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[23]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale‐up to trade‐offs and synergies in ecosystem services , 2012 .

[25]  Zoltán Botta-Dukát,et al.  Patterns of plant trait-environment relationships along a forest succession chronosequence , 2011 .

[26]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[27]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[28]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  Statistical mapping of tree species over Europe , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[29]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  F. Piper,et al.  Intraspecific trait variation and covariation in a widespread tree species (Nothofagus pumilio) in southern Chile. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[31]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  A multi‐trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra‐ vs. interspecific variability in plant traits , 2010 .

[32]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  Interspecific variation in functional traits, not climatic differences among species ranges, determines demographic rates across 44 temperate and Mediterranean tree species , 2010 .

[33]  Brian J McGill,et al.  How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[34]  Nathan G. Swenson,et al.  Variation in leaf functional trait values within and across individuals and species: an example from a Costa Rican dry forest , 2010 .

[35]  E. Nikinmaa,et al.  Hydraulic adjustment of Scots pine across Europe. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[36]  Shawn W. Laffan,et al.  Global patterns in plant height , 2009 .

[37]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[38]  J. Chave,et al.  Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum 2 . L E a D I N G D I M E N S I O N S I N W O O D F U N C T I O N , 2022 .

[39]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California , 2009 .

[40]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Shade Tolerance, a Key Plant Feature of Complex Nature and Consequences , 2008 .

[41]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests. , 2008, Ecology.

[42]  S. Davies,et al.  Interspecific demographic trade‐offs and soil‐related habitat associations of tree species along resource gradients , 2007 .

[43]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[44]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[46]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  MULTIPLE TRAIT ASSOCIATIONS IN RELATION TO HABITAT DIFFERENTIATION AMONG 17 FLORIDIAN OAK SPECIES , 2004 .

[47]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  The ecological significance of long-distance water transport: short-term regulation, long-term acclimation and the hydraulic costs of stature across plant life forms , 2003 .

[48]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[49]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Dynamics of Russian Forests and the Carbon Budget in 1961–1998: An Assessment Based on Long-Term Forest Inventory Data , 2002 .

[50]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[51]  C. Peng,et al.  Changes in Forest Biomass Carbon Storage in China Between 1949 and 1998 , 2001, Science.

[52]  Miquel Ninyerola,et al.  A methodological approach of climatological modelling of air temperature and precipitation through GIS techniques , 2000 .

[53]  S. Robeson,et al.  Spatial variability of micro-climatic conditions within a mid-latitude deciduous forest , 2000 .

[54]  P. Reich,et al.  Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. , 1999, American journal of botany.