The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry.

One extensively investigated form of perceptual bistability is binocular rivalry--When dissimilar patterns are presented one to each eye, these patterns compete for perceptual dominance. Here, we report that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over early visual areas induces alternations during binocular rivalry. The effect of TMS on binocular rivalry was retinotopic, suggesting that rivalry mechanisms are localized in the cortical representation of visual space. The timing of perturbations was highly dependent on individual differences in rivalry alternation frequencies, with more delayed effects found in slower alternators. This finding suggests that both binocular rivalry and TMS dynamics might be contingent on individual differences among observers. We performed an analogous set of experiments by replacing TMS with transient visual stimulation. The results, however, qualitatively and quantitatively differed from those reported with TMS. Finally, we found that TMS over early visual areas does not produce any time-locked effects on another dynamical process--eye-swapping stimulus rivalry. These findings constitute the first causative evidence that binocular rivalry is contingent on neural activity in early visual areas and suggest that binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry have different neural correlates, supporting multilevel theories of visual rivalry.

[1]  A. Sanders.  Attention and performance III : proceedings of a symposium on attention and performance, held in Soesterberg August 4-8,1969, under the auspices of the Institute for Perception RVO-TNO, Soesterberg, the Netherlands , 1970 .

[2]  M. Hollins,et al.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Perceptual Alternation Induced by Visual Transients , 2005, Perception.

[4]  James J. Clark,et al.  Microsaccades as an overt measure of covert attention shifts , 2002, Vision Research.

[5]  N. Logothetis,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry , 1996 .

[6]  Laurie A. Miller,et al.  Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[8]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures , 1998, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[9]  W. Levelt.  On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[10]  Alan W Freeman,et al.  Multistage model for binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks , 2005, Current Biology.

[12]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Motion Retards Alternations between Conflicting Perceptual Interpretations , 2003, Neuron.

[13]  M. Lankheet,et al.  Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[14]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Dynamics of propagating waves in the olfactory network of a terrestrial mollusk: an electrical and optical study. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Spurný.  Synchronization of oscillatory rhythms of stems and leaves , 1976, Biologia Plantarum.

[16]  L. Dam,et al.  Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry , 2006 .

[17]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries? , 2003, Perception.

[18]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[19]  R. Blake,et al.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  A. Karni,et al.  A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence , 2001, Vision Research.

[21]  Richard A. Tyrrell,et al.  A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena: The Modified Binary Search (MOBS) , 1988 .

[22]  G. Rees,et al.  Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  H. Wilson.  Spikes, Decisions, and Actions: The Dynamical Foundations of Neuroscience , 1999 .

[24]  R. P. O'Shea,et al.  Binocular rivalry in split-brain observers. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[25]  Paul M. Corballis,et al.  Visual grouping on binocular rivalry in a split-brain observer , 2005, Vision Research.

[26]  R. Blake,et al.  Rival ideas about binocular rivalry , 1999, Vision Research.

[27]  Alan Cowey,et al.  The Ferrier Lecture 2004 What can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works? , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[29]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention , 2003, Vision Research.

[31]  R. Wilfred George,et al.  The Significance of the Fluctuations Experienced in Observing Ambiguous Figures and in Binocular Rivalry , 1936 .

[32]  C. Blundo,et al.  Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Felix Hasler,et al.  Modulating the Rate and Rhythmicity of Perceptual Rivalry Alternations with the Mixed 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A Agonist Psilocybin , 2005, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[35]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention , 2005, Vision Research.

[37]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[38]  M. Hallett.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[39]  Stephan Riek,et al.  Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry , 2000, Current Biology.

[40]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Visual stimuli induce waves of electrical activity in turtle cortex. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a neurochromometrics of mind. , 2003 .

[42]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[43]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  R. Blake,et al.  Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[45]  Yee-Joon Kim,et al.  Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[46]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[47]  Colin W. G. Clifford,et al.  When Your Brain Decides What You See , 2005 .

[48]  T. Paus,et al.  Synchronization of neuronal activity in the human primary motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation: an EEG study. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  W. Singer,et al.  Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[51]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.