Online journals: impact on print journal usage.

PURPOSE The research sought to determine the impact of online journals on the use of print journals and interlibrary loan (ILL). SETTING The Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria is a regional site of the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Library with a print journal collection of approximately 400 titles. Since 1999, UIC site licenses have given students and faculty affiliated with UIC-Peoria access to more than 4,000 online full-text journal titles through the Internet. METHODOLOGY The Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria has conducted a journal-use study over an extended period of time. The information collected from this study was used to assess the impact of 104 online journals, added to the collection in January 1999, on the use of print journals. RESULTS Results of the statistical analysis showed print journal usage decreased significantly since the introduction of online journals (F(1,147) = 12.10, P < 0.001). This decrease occurred regardless of whether a journal was available only in print or both online and in print. Interlibrary loan requests have also significantly decreased since the introduction of online journals (F(2,30) = 4.46, P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The decrease in use of the print collection suggests that many patrons prefer to access journals online. The negative impact the online journals have had on the use of the journal titles available only in print suggests users may be compromising quality for convenience when selecting journal articles. Possible implications for collection development are discussed.

[1]  Judy Luther.  White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics , 2002 .

[2]  N L Pelzer,et al.  Library use and information-seeking behavior of veterinary medical students revisited in the electronic environment. , 1998, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[3]  Julie M. Hurd,et al.  From Print to Electronic: The Adoption of Information Technology by Academic Chemists. , 1998 .

[4]  Kathleen E. Joswick,et al.  The Core List Mirage: A Comparison of the Journals Frequently Consulted by Faculty and Students , 1997 .

[5]  Dorothy Milne,et al.  A cost-per-use method for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of serials: A detailed discussion of methodology , 1991 .

[6]  Sally A. Rogers,et al.  Electronic Journal Usage at Ohio State University , 2001 .

[7]  J. Hurd,et al.  Information-seeking behavior of health sciences faculty: the impact of new information technologies. , 1997, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[8]  Judy Luther.  Reprint: White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics , 2001 .

[9]  J Franklin,et al.  Biotechnology awareness study, Part 1: Where scientists get their information. , 1991, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[10]  Margaret W. Maxfield,et al.  Decreasing use of monthly serials after publication date , 1996 .

[11]  Adele F. Bane.  Business Periodicals Ondisc: how full-text availability affects the library , 1995 .

[12]  Christopher A. Millson-Martula.  Use studies and serials rationalization: a review , 1988 .

[13]  Ian R. Young.  The use of a general periodicals bibliographic database transaction log as a serials collection management tool , 1992 .

[14]  Roberta Pessah,et al.  Document Delivery: St. John's University's Experience with Full-Text Services. , 1995 .

[15]  D. Blecic.  Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlations between three methods. , 1999, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.