Re-illumination of streamer stems under either rising or non-changing positive electric fields in long air gaps

Characteristics of the streamer stem are essential for the study on the stable leader inception. Experiments are conducted to observe the re-illumination of streamer stems under either rising or non-changing positive electric fields in long air gaps, preceding the inception of a stable leader. Based on the simultaneously measured applied voltage, discharge current, direct images, and schlieren images, two typical types of stem re-illuminations are identified and show great differences. For the stem re-illumination under the rising electric field, it is accompanied by an abrupt elongation of stem channel, intense optical radiation, and a current superposed on at least two asynchronous current pulses, while for that subjected to the nearly non-changing electric field, there are no elongation of stem channel, a much weaker light emission, and a single, double exponential current pulse. Moreover, the latter case shows obvious periodicity. A comparative analysis of experimental results shows that factors triggering these two types of stem re-illuminations may be also different in which not only the electric field but also its time derivatives play an important role. These findings can further deepen the understanding of the streamer stem before the leader inception.

[1]  M. Becerra,et al.  Elongation and branching of stem channels produced by positive streamers in long air gaps , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Junjia He,et al.  Observations of the Channel Illuminations During Dark Periods in Long Positive Sparks , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[3]  U. Ebert,et al.  The physics of streamer discharge phenomena , 2020, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[4]  N. Popov,et al.  Stepwise Development of a Positive Long Spark in the Air , 2020 .

[5]  Lipeng Liu,et al.  On the use of quantitative Schlieren techniques in temperature measurement of leader discharge channels , 2019, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[6]  Junjia He,et al.  On the stem diameter under positive impulses in long air gaps , 2019, Physics of Plasmas.

[7]  J. He,et al.  On the Velocity‐Current Relation of Positive Leader Discharges , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[8]  Junjia He,et al.  Number of stems around the H.V. electrode in a 0.74-m air gap under positive impulse , 2018, Physics of Plasmas.

[9]  Junjia He,et al.  Relaxation process of the discharge channel near the anode in long air gaps under positive impulse voltages , 2017 .

[10]  Lipeng Liu,et al.  Gas heating dynamics during leader inception in long air gaps at atmospheric pressure , 2017 .

[11]  Victor P. Pasko,et al.  Dynamics of streamer‐to‐leader transition at reduced air densities and its implications for propagation of lightning leaders and gigantic jets , 2013 .

[12]  Rong Zeng,et al.  The dynamic velocity of long positive streamers observed using a multi-frame ICCD camera in a 57 cm air gap , 2013 .

[13]  U. Ebert,et al.  Investigation of positive streamers by double-pulse experiments, effects of repetition rate and gas mixture , 2013, 1310.4307.

[14]  Weijiang Chen,et al.  An improved model to determine the inception of positive upward leader-streamer system considering the leader propagation during dark period , 2013 .

[15]  V. Cooray,et al.  A self-consistent upward leader propagation model , 2006 .

[16]  E. Williams.  Problems in lightning physics—the role of polarity asymmetry , 2006 .

[17]  J Dupuy,et al.  Large air-gap discharge and Schlieren techniques , 1988 .

[18]  I. Gallimberti,et al.  The mechanism of the long spark formation , 1979 .

[19]  J. Montanyà,et al.  Observations of corona point discharges from grounded rods under thunderstorms , 2021 .