Transformation invariant control of voxel-wise false discovery rate.

Multiple testing for statistical maps remains a critical and challenging problem in brain mapping. Since the false discovery rate (FDR) criterion was introduced to the neuroimaging community a decade ago, many variations have been proposed, mainly to enhance detection power. However, a fundamental geometrical property known as transformation invariance has not been adequately addressed, especially for the voxel-wise FDR. Correction of multiple testing applied after spatial transformation is not necessarily equivalent to transformation applied after correction in the original space. Without the invariance property, assigning different testing spaces will yield different results. We find that normalized residuals of linear models with Gaussian noises are uniformly distributed on a unit high-dimensional sphere, independent of t-statistics and F-statistics. By defining volumetric measure in the hyperspherical space mapped by normalized residuals, instead of the image's Euclidean space, we can achieve invariant control of the FDR under diffeomorphic transformation. This hyperspherical measure also reflects intrinsic "volume of randomness" in signals. Experiments with synthetic, semi-synthetic and real images demonstrate that our method significantly reduces FDR inconsistency introduced by the choice of testing spaces.

[1]  M. Newton Large-Scale Simultaneous Hypothesis Testing: The Choice of a Null Hypothesis , 2008 .

[2]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  Tao Yu,et al.  MULTIPLE TESTING VIA FDRL FOR LARGE SCALE IMAGING DATA , 2011, 1103.1966.

[4]  J. Li,et al.  Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix , 2005, Heredity.

[5]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[6]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  Ramon Casanova,et al.  Estimation of false discovery rates for wavelet-denoised statistical parametric maps , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields , 2009, NeuroImage.

[9]  William Kahan,et al.  Pracniques: further remarks on reducing truncation errors , 1965, CACM.

[10]  Brian S Caffo,et al.  Adaptive control of the false discovery rate in voxel‐based morphometry , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Multiple Hypotheses Testing with Weights , 1997 .

[12]  R. Rosenthal The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[13]  Jonathan E. Taylor,et al.  Empirical null and false discovery rate analysis in neuroimaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[15]  J.A. Mumford,et al.  Modeling and inference of multisubject fMRI data , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[17]  I. Verdinelli,et al.  False Discovery Control for Random Fields , 2004 .

[18]  J. Cheverud,et al.  A simple correction for multiple comparisons in interval mapping genome scans , 2001, Heredity.

[19]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Mixed-effects and fMRI studies , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  Glenn Lawyer,et al.  Local and covariate-modulated false discovery rates applied in neuroimaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[22]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort , 2014, NeuroImage.

[23]  David Borsook,et al.  Enhanced false discovery rate using Gaussian mixture models for thresholding fMRI statistical maps , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  C. Almli,et al.  Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood , 2009, NeuroImage.

[25]  Thomas F. Nugent,et al.  Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Lei Huang,et al.  Paradoxical results of adaptive false discovery rate procedures in neuroimaging studies , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  Tao Yu,et al.  MULTIPLE TESTING VIA FDRL FOR LARGE SCALE IMAGING DATA , 2011 .

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Diffeomorphic registration using geodesic shooting and Gauss–Newton optimisation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[29]  Joshua Carp,et al.  The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature , 2012, NeuroImage.

[30]  K. Worsley,et al.  Random fields of multivariate test statistics, with applications to shape analysis , 2008, 0803.1708.

[31]  Dave R. M. Langers,et al.  Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate , 2007, NeuroImage.

[32]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Brooks Why most published research findings are false: Ioannidis JP, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece , 2008 .

[34]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Cluster-based analysis of FMRI data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Topological FDR for neuroimaging , 2010, NeuroImage.

[36]  John D. Storey,et al.  Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment , 2001 .

[37]  CM Bennett,et al.  Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: an argument for multiple comparisons correction , 2009, NeuroImage.

[38]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate , 2006 .

[39]  John D. Storey A direct approach to false discovery rates , 2002 .

[40]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Detecting changes in nonisotropic images , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[41]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2009 .

[42]  Andrew L. Janke,et al.  False Discovery Rate Control in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies via Markov Random Fields , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Controlling False Discovery Rate in Signal Space for Transformation-Invariant Thresholding of Statistical Maps , 2015, IPMI.