The Ownership Effect in Consumer Responses to Brand Line Stretches

In this article, the authors examine how ownership status moderates the effects of stretch direction (up or down), brand image (prestige or nonprestige), and branding strategy (subbrand name or direct) on consumer responses to price-based line stretches. An “ownership effect” is proposed whereby owners have more favorable responses than nonowners to the brand's extensions. The ownership effect occurs for upward and downward stretches of non-prestige brands and for upward stretches of prestige brands. For downward stretches of prestige brands, however, the ownership effect does not occur because of owners’ desire to maintain brand exclusivity. In this situation, a sub-branding strategy protects owners’ parent brand attitudes from dilution. A field study and two lab studies confirm the hypotheses.

[1]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[2]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[3]  D A Aaker,et al.  Should you take your brand to where the action is? , 1997, Harvard business review.

[4]  Peter H. Bloch,et al.  After the New Wears Off: The Temporal Context of Product Involvement , 1986 .

[5]  Marsha L. Richins.  Special Possessions and the Expression of Material Values , 1994 .

[6]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[7]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience , 1986 .

[8]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  The Negative Impact of Extensions: Can Flagship Products be Diluted? , 1998 .

[9]  C. Steele.  The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[10]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency , 1991 .

[11]  John A. Quelch,et al.  Extend Profits, Not Product Lines , 1994 .

[12]  J. Zaichkowsky.  Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[13]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions , 1992 .

[14]  James K. Beggan.  On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. , 1992 .

[15]  D. Aaker.  Building Strong Brands , 1995 .

[16]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience , 1989 .

[17]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[18]  Kent B. Monroe,et al.  Effect of Product-Line Pricing Characteristics on Product Evaluations , 1987 .

[19]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Managing Negative Feedback Effects Associated With Brand Extensions: The Impact of Alternative Branding Strategies , 1997 .

[20]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[21]  J. Bettman,et al.  Influencing Consumer Judgments Using Autobiographical Memories: A Self-Referencing Perspective , 1993 .

[22]  Srinivas K. Reddy,et al.  To Extend or Not to Extend: Success Determinants of Line Extensions , 1994 .

[23]  David M. Boush,et al.  A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation , 1991 .

[24]  Robert E. Smith.  Integrating Information from Advertising and Trial: Processes and Effects on Consumer Response to Product Information , 1993 .

[25]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management , 1986 .

[26]  J. Bettman,et al.  The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers’ Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights from Schema Research , 1989 .

[27]  Robert E. Kleine,et al.  How Is a Possession “Me” or “Not Me”? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment , 1995 .

[28]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes , 1988 .

[29]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact? , 1993 .