Sense and Avoid for Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Ensuring Integrity and Continuity for Three Dimensional Intruder Trajectories

This research aims at developing methods to meet safety targets for sense and avoid (SAA) sensors of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) through integrity and continuity risk evaluation. The SAA problem is presented as a three-dimensional, two-body problem. A Kalman filter approach is introduced to accommodate arbitrary sensor suites. Aircraft relative position and velocity estimates, referred to as trajectory state estimates, are transformed into hazard state estimates, which are used to quantify integrity and continuity risks. A sensitivity analysis is performed based on a set of representative, near-worst-case, three-dimensional intruder trajectories. The resulting impact on integrity and continuity is quantified for a composite nominal sensor. The concepts and methods in this research are intended to be used as a tool for certification authorities to set potential requirements for integration into the national airspace system.

[1]  Matthew W. M. Edwards,et al.  Validating a concept for airborne sense and avoid , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[2]  P. Enge,et al.  Paired overbounding for nonideal LAAS and WAAS error distributions , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  Mathieu Joerger,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft System Sense and Avoid Integrity and Continuity Risk for Non-Cooperatve Intruders , 2015 .

[4]  Alex Fung,et al.  Multi-Sensor Data Integration for Autonomous Sense and Avoid , 2011 .

[5]  C. V. Girod,et al.  Standards and Recommended Practices , 1998 .

[6]  L P Espindle,et al.  Safety Analysis of Upgrading to TCAS Version 7.1 Using the 2008 U.S. Correlated Encounter Model , 2009 .

[7]  Mykel J. Kochenderfer,et al.  Collision avoidance for general aviation , 2011, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[8]  Hak-Tae Lee,et al.  Engineering Notes Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Unmanned Aerial System Operations , 2013 .

[9]  韓國航空大學 航空 械工學科.  美聯邦航空廳(Federal Aviation Administration)의 航空機 製作檢査 制度의 現況 , 1979 .

[10]  Mykel J. Kochenderfer,et al.  Accounting for State Uncertainty in Collision Avoidance , 2011 .

[11]  Matthew W. M. Edwards,et al.  Establishing a Risk-Based Separation Standard for Unmanned Aircraft Self Separation , 2011 .

[12]  J.K. Kuchar,et al.  Remotely piloted vehicles in civil airspace: requirements and analysis methods for the traffic alert and collision avoidance system (TCAS) and see-and-avoid systems , 2004, The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576).

[13]  Jong-Hun Kim,et al.  Development of an electro-optical system for small UAV , 2010 .

[14]  Kimon P. Valavanis,et al.  On unmanned aircraft systems issues, challenges and operational restrictions preventing integration into the National Airspace System , 2008 .

[15]  Bruce DeCleene,et al.  Defining Pseudorange Integrity - Overbounding , 2000 .

[16]  Michael P. Owen,et al.  Unmanned aircraft sense and avoid radar: Surrogate flight testing performance evaluation , 2014, 2014 IEEE Radar Conference.

[17]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Sense and avoid technologies with applications to unmanned aircraft systems: Review and prospects , 2015 .

[18]  R. J. Kelly,et al.  REQUIRED NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE (RNP) FOR PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING WITH GNSS APPLICATION , 1994 .

[19]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[20]  Thomas B Billingsley.  Safety Analysis of TCAS on Global Hawk Using Airspace Encounter Models , 2006 .

[21]  Andrew D. Zeitlin,et al.  Safety Study of TCAS II for Logic Version 6.04 , 1992 .

[22]  Matthew Edwards,et al.  A Safety Driven Approach to the Development of an Airborne Sense and Avoid System , 2012, Infotech@Aerospace.

[23]  Mykel J. Kochenderfer,et al.  Airspace Encounter Models for Estimating Collision Risk , 2010 .

[24]  Ernest E Anderson,et al.  A legal analysis of 14 C.F.R. Part 91 "see and avoid" rules to identify provisions focused on pilot responsibilities to "see and avoid" in the National Airspace System , 2015 .

[25]  Eric R. Mueller,et al.  Investigating Effects of Well Clear Definitions on UAS Sense-And-Avoid Operations in Enroute and Transition Airspace , 2013 .

[26]  E. Steele,et al.  FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 , 2014 .

[27]  Curtis W. Heisey,et al.  A Reference Software Architecture to Support Unmanned Aircraft Integration in the National Airspace System , 2013, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[28]  Rodney E. Cole,et al.  Defining Well Clear for Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2015 .

[29]  Pablo Royo Chic,et al.  Requirements, issues, and challenges for sense and avoid in Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2012 .

[30]  A.H. Haddad,et al.  Applied optimal estimation , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.