Online control of reach accuracy in mice.

Reaching movements, as a basic yet complex motor behavior, are a foundational model system in neuroscience. In particular, there has been a significant recent expansion of investigation into the neural circuit mechanisms of reach behavior in mice. Nevertheless, quantification of mouse reach kinematics remains lacking, limiting comparison to the primate literature. In this study, we quantitatively demonstrate the homology of mouse reach kinematics to primate reach, and also discover novel late-phase correlational structure that implies online control. Overall, our results highlight the decelerative phase of reach as important in driving successful outcome. Specifically, we develop and implement a novel statistical machine learning algorithm to identify kinematic features associated with successful reaches and find that late-phase kinematics are most predictive of outcome, signifying online reach control as opposed to pre-planning. Moreover, we identify and characterize late-phase kinematic adjustments that are yoked to mid-flight position and velocity of the limb, allowing for dynamic correction of initial variability, with head-fixed reaches being less dependent on position in comparison to freely-behaving reaches. Furthermore, consecutive reaches exhibit positional error-correction but not hot-handedness, implying opponent regulation of motor variability. Overall, our results establish foundational mouse reach kinematics in the context of neuroscientific investigation, characterizing mouse reach production as an active process that relies on dynamic online control mechanisms.

[1]  Eric A. Yttri,et al.  Opponent and bidirectional control of movement velocity in the basal ganglia , 2016, Nature.

[2]  Deric Wisleder,et al.  Influence of biomechanical factors on substructure of pointing movements , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy) , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  Ashesh K Dhawale,et al.  Adaptive Regulation of Motor Variability , 2019, Current Biology.

[7]  Simon X. Chen,et al.  Emergence of reproducible spatiotemporal activity during motor learning , 2014, Nature.

[8]  Kristin Branson,et al.  Cortex commands the performance of skilled movement , 2015, eLife.

[9]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[10]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Impairments in Skilled Reaching in the Mouse (Mus musculus) After a Focal Motor Cortex Stroke , 2002, Stroke.

[12]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Matthew I. Becker,et al.  Cerebellar Control of Reach Kinematics for Endpoint Precision , 2019, Neuron.

[14]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  The structure of skilled forelimb reaching in the rat: A proximally driven movement with a single distal rotatory component , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias , 2017, Neuron.

[16]  K. S. Lashley,et al.  INTEGRATIVE FUNCTIONS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX , 1933 .

[17]  Stephen I. Ryu,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Motor Cortical Correlates of a Rapidly Adapting Visuomotor Internal Model , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  Olfaction directs skilled forelimb reaching in the rat , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  Thomas M. Jessell,et al.  Skilled reaching relies on a V2a propriospinal internal copy circuit , 2014, Nature.

[20]  Adam Sanjurjo,et al.  Surprised by the Gambler's and Hot Hand Fallacies? A Truth in the Law of Small Numbers , 2016 .

[21]  Jessica R Kuntz,et al.  A mouse’s spontaneous eating repertoire aids performance on laboratory skilled reaching tasks: A motoric example of instinctual drift with an ethological description of the withdraw movements in freely-moving and head-fixed mice , 2018, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  Eva L. Dyer,et al.  Latent Factors and Dynamics in Motor Cortex and Their Application to Brain–Machine Interfaces , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Chethan Pandarinath,et al.  Inferring single-trial neural population dynamics using sequential auto-encoders , 2017, Nature Methods.

[24]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Behaviorally Selective Engagement of Short-Latency Effector Pathways by Motor Cortex , 2017, Neuron.

[26]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[27]  Michael A. Khan,et al.  Online Versus Offline Processing of Visual Feedback in the Production of Component Submovements , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[28]  D. Elliott,et al.  Visual regulation of manual aiming , 1993 .

[29]  Gregorio Luis Galiñanes,et al.  Directional Reaching for Water as a Cortex-Dependent Behavioral Framework for Mice , 2018, Cell reports.

[30]  H. Diener,et al.  Pathophysiology of cerebellar ataxia , 1992, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[31]  Jun Nakanishi,et al.  Practice reduces task relevant variance modulation and forms nominal trajectory , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Jessica R Kuntz,et al.  Organization of the reach and grasp in head-fixed vs freely-moving mice provides support for multiple motor channel theory of neocortical organization , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Karunesh Ganguly,et al.  Emergent Modular Neural Control Drives Coordinated Motor Actions , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Silvia Arber,et al.  Brainstem nucleus MdV mediates skilled forelimb motor tasks , 2014, Nature.

[36]  J. A. Pruszynski,et al.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  J. Hore,et al.  Cerebellar dysmetria at the elbow, wrist, and fingers. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  W. Spijkers,et al.  Partial visual feedback and spatial end-point accuracy of discrete aiming movements. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  Ashesh K Dhawale,et al.  The Role of Variability in Motor Learning. , 2017, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Laure Fernandez,et al.  Effects of biomechanical and task constraints on the organization of movement in precision aiming , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Joint angle variability in 3D bimanual pointing: uncontrolled manifold analysis , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  Ian Q Whishaw,et al.  Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans. , 2018, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[44]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[45]  K. Shenoy,et al.  A Central Source of Movement Variability , 2006, Neuron.

[46]  K. An,et al.  Estimate of the Optimum Cutoff Frequency for the Butterworth Low-Pass Digital Filter , 1999 .

[47]  Romeo Chua,et al.  The violation of Fitts’ Law: an examination of displacement biases and corrective submovements , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  J. Tanji,et al.  Anticipatory activity of motor cortex neurons in relation to direction of an intended movement. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[50]  Cynthia A. Chestek,et al.  Intracortical Brain-Machine Interfaces Advance Sensorimotor Neuroscience , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[51]  J. Krakauer,et al.  A computational neuroanatomy for motor control , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  R. Ivry,et al.  The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Selmaan N. Chettih,et al.  Cerebellar-Dependent Expression of Motor Learning during Eyeblink Conditioning in Head-Fixed Mice , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  I. Whishaw,et al.  On the origin of skilled forelimb movements , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[55]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  J. Houk,et al.  Features of motor performance that drive adaptation in rapid hand movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  Jesse H Goldberg,et al.  Automated home cage training of mice in a hold-still center-out reach task. , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  J. Krakauer,et al.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[60]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[61]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  M. Brainard,et al.  Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong , 2007, Nature.

[63]  I. Whishaw An endpoint, descriptive, and kinematic comparison of skilled reaching in mice (Mus musculus) with rats (Rattus norvegicus) , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[64]  G. Fullerton Psychology and physiology. , 1896 .

[65]  Julie Messier,et al.  Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[66]  Robert H. Cudmore,et al.  Cortical Synaptic AMPA Receptor Plasticity during Motor Learning , 2019, Neuron.

[67]  Mackenzie W. Mathis,et al.  Somatosensory Cortex Plays an Essential Role in Forelimb Motor Adaptation in Mice , 2017, Neuron.

[68]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[69]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  The Main Sequence of Saccades Optimizes Speed-accuracy Trade-off , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[70]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[71]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Contributions to Learning in a Sensorimotor Adaptation Task , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  Yohsuke R. Miyamoto,et al.  Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[73]  Zong-Ming Li,et al.  Functional degrees of freedom. , 2006, Motor control.

[74]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[75]  Eiman Azim,et al.  Internal and External Feedback Circuits for Skilled Forelimb Movement. , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[76]  M. Sahani,et al.  Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective. , 2013, Annual review of neuroscience.

[77]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  Skilled reaching in rats and humans: evidence for parallel development or homology , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.