Invasive plants have broader physiological niches

Significance Invasibility (the vulnerability of a receiving environment to invasion) and invasiveness (the capacity of an organism to invade) are fundamental metrics in theoretical ecology. However, attempts to apply these concepts to the question of whether an introduced species will invade have failed. Here, we use a model that characterizes the physiological niche of plants to successfully predict invasive success of 749 species. We find that, although invasive success is dependent on different factors in different ecological contexts, the modeled global potential range of species integrates these contingencies to produce a reliable and interpretable indicator of the likelihood that a species will reproduce and spread. Invasive species cost the global economy billions of dollars each year, but ecologists have struggled to predict the risk of an introduced species naturalizing and invading. Although carefully designed experiments are needed to fully elucidate what makes some species invasive, much can be learned from unintentional experiments involving the introduction of species beyond their native ranges. Here, we assess invasion risk by linking a physiologically based species distribution model with data on the invasive success of 749 Australian acacia and eucalypt tree species that have, over more than a century, been introduced around the world. The model correctly predicts 92% of occurrences observed outside of Australia from an independent dataset. We found that invasiveness is positively associated with the projection of physiological niche volume in geographic space, thereby illustrating that species tolerant of a broader range of environmental conditions are more likely to be invasive. Species achieve this broader tolerance in different ways, meaning that the traits that define invasive success are context-specific. Hence, our study reconciles studies that have failed to identify the traits that define invasive success with the urgent and pragmatic need to predict invasive success.

[1]  G. Andrew,et al.  arm: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2014 .

[2]  A. Forsman Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion, and infection biology , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  C. Hui,et al.  Macroecology meets invasion ecology: performance of Australian acacias and eucalypts around the world revealed by features of their native ranges , 2013, Biological Invasions.

[4]  J. Franklin Species distribution models in conservation biogeography: developments and challenges , 2013 .

[5]  M. Kearney,et al.  Balancing heat, water and nutrients under environmental change: a thermodynamic niche framework , 2013 .

[6]  Michael D. Cramer,et al.  A physiological analogy of the niche for projecting the potential distribution of plants , 2012 .

[7]  Greg J. McInerny,et al.  Ditch the niche – is the niche a useful concept in ecology or species distribution modelling? , 2012 .

[8]  Steven I. Higgins,et al.  A niche for biology in species distribution models , 2012 .

[9]  D. Richardson,et al.  Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[10]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Selecting pseudo‐absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? , 2012 .

[11]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Climatic Niche Shifts Are Rare Among Terrestrial Plant Invaders , 2012, Science.

[12]  Philip E. Hulme,et al.  Weed risk assessment: a way forward or a waste of time? , 2012 .

[13]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions , 2011 .

[14]  D. Richardson,et al.  Human‐mediated introductions of Australian acacias – a global experiment in biogeography , 2011 .

[15]  Matthew E Ritchie,et al.  Using the R Package crlmm for Genotyping and Copy Number Estimation. , 2011, Journal of statistical software.

[16]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[17]  David Ardia,et al.  DEoptim: An R Package for Global Optimization by Differential Evolution , 2009 .

[18]  Maria A. Gandolfo,et al.  Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale , 2009, Nature.

[19]  D. Simberloff The Role of Propagule Pressure in Biological Invasions , 2009 .

[20]  Thibaut Jombart,et al.  adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers , 2008, Bioinform..

[21]  S. Barry,et al.  Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[22]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Richardson,et al.  Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale , 2005, Global change biology.

[24]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[25]  Bas Kooijman,et al.  Dynamic Energy Budget Theory for Metabolic Organisation , 2005 .

[26]  H. Mooney Invasive alien species : a new synthesis , 2005 .

[27]  David Tilman,et al.  Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  A. Peterson Predicting the Geography of Species’ Invasions via Ecological Niche Modeling , 2003, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[29]  N. Batjes,et al.  ISRIC-WISE global data set of derived soil properties on a 0.5 by 0.5 degree grid (ver. 3.0) , 2002 .

[30]  C. Kolar,et al.  Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[32]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[33]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[34]  K. Gaston Species-range size distributions: products of speciation, extinction and transformation , 1998 .

[35]  J. Thornley,et al.  Modelling Shoot:Root Relations: the Only Way Forward? , 1998 .

[36]  D. Richardson,et al.  What attributes make some plant species more invasive , 1996 .

[37]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress , 1991 .

[38]  R. Macarthur Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .