Third wave of measurement in the self-regulated learning field: when measurement and intervention come hand in hand

ABSTRACT Measurement is a central issue for the self-regulated learning (SRL) field as SRL is a phenomenon difficult to measure in a reliable and valid way. Here, 3 waves in the history of SRL measurement are identified and profiled. Our focus lies on the third and newest one, which combines measurement and intervention within the same tools. The basis for this approach is located in the reactivity principle via students’ self-monitoring: when students are aware of their actions, they can react and change what is needed. That happens when the measurement tools promote students' self-monitoring which turn part of the intervention then. Examples of this new approach to SRL measurement and guidelines for implementing it are presented.

[1]  S. Järvelä,et al.  SOCIALLY SHARED REGULATION EMPIRICAL REVIEW 1 Reviewing findings on socially shared regulation of learning , 2018 .

[2]  P. Pintrich.  Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning , 2017 .

[3]  Jonna Malmberg,et al.  How Individual Self-Regulation Affects Group Regulation and Performance , 2015 .

[4]  Albert Ziegler,et al.  Competencies for successful self-regulated learning in higher education: structural model and indications drawn from expert interviews , 2015 .

[5]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools , 2014, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[6]  S. Järvelä,et al.  Socially Shared Regulation of Learning: A Review , 2015 .

[7]  Ernesto Panadero,et al.  How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman"s cyclical model of self-regulated learning , 2014 .

[8]  S. Järvelä,et al.  Sequential and temporal characteristics of self and socially regulated learning , 2014 .

[9]  Allyson F. Hadwin,et al.  nStudy: Tracing and Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in the Internet , 2013 .

[10]  Ulrich Ebner-Priemer,et al.  Ambulatory assessment. , 2013, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[11]  Ernesto Panadero,et al.  Rubrics and Self-Assessment Scripts Effects on Self-Regulation, Learning and Self-Efficacy in Secondary Education. , 2012 .

[12]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning , 2012 .

[13]  B. Schmitz,et al.  Using Diaries in Developmental Research: Collecting and Analyzing Longitudinal Diary Data , 2011 .

[14]  M. Veenman.  Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: a discussion , 2011 .

[15]  B. Hout-Wolters,et al.  Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: theoretical and empirical considerations , 2011 .

[16]  Bernhard Schmitz,et al.  Self-monitoring of self-regulation during math homework behaviour using standardized diaries , 2011 .

[17]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance , 2011 .

[18]  Traci Sitzmann,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: what we know and where we need to go. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  B. Schmitz,et al.  Assessing self-regulated learning using diary measures with university students , 2011 .

[20]  T. Cleary.  Emergence of Self-Regulated Learning Microanalysis , 2011 .

[21]  M. Boekaerts,et al.  Emotions, Emotion Regulation, and Self-Regulation of Learning , 2011 .

[22]  S. Järvelä,et al.  Self-Regulated, Co-Regulated, and Socially Shared Regulation of Learning , 2011 .

[23]  J. Greene,et al.  Assessing Self-Regulated Learning Using Think-Aloud Methods , 2011 .

[24]  Nancy E. Perry,et al.  Studying Self-Regulated Learning in Classrooms , 2011 .

[25]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Effects of class size and adaptive teaching competency on classroom processes and academic outcome , 2011 .

[26]  A. Efklides.  Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model , 2011 .

[27]  Bernhard Schmitz,et al.  A plea for self-regulated learning as a process: Modelling, measuring and intervening , 2011 .

[28]  Exploring the Construct Validity of Academic Self-Regulation Using a New Self-Report Questionnaire - the Survey of Academic Self-Regulation , 2011 .

[29]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Improving Measurements of Self-Regulated Learning , 2010 .

[30]  R. Azevedo,et al.  The Measurement of Learners’ Self-Regulated Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes While Using Computer-Based Learning Environments , 2010 .

[31]  Bernhard Schmitz,et al.  How to Perform Idiographic and a Combination of Idiographic and Nomothetic Approaches , 2010 .

[32]  Candice Burkett,et al.  Self-regulated Learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the Science of Learning with MetaCognitive Tools , 2010 .

[33]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. , 2009 .

[34]  Charlotte Dignath,et al.  Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level , 2008 .

[35]  B. Zimmerman.  Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[36]  Charlotte Dignath,et al.  How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes , 2008 .

[37]  K. Pawlik,et al.  Ambulatory Assessment - Monitoring Behavior in Daily Life Settings A Behavioral-Scientific Challenge for Psychology , 2007 .

[38]  Marit S. Samuelstuen,et al.  Examining the validity of self-reports on scales measuring students' strategic processing. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[39]  Bernhard Schmitz,et al.  Advantages of studying processes in educational research , 2006 .

[40]  Bernhard Schmitz,et al.  New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data , 2006 .

[41]  H. Marsh,et al.  Teacher frame of reference and the big-fish-little-pond effect , 2005 .

[42]  M. Boekaerts,et al.  Self-Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention , 2005 .

[43]  P. Karoly,et al.  Toward Consensus in the Psychology of Self‐Regulation: How Far Have We Come? How Far Do We Have Yet to Travel? , 2005 .

[44]  Anastasia Kitsantas,et al.  The Hidden Dimension of Personal Competence: Self-Regulated Learning and Practice. , 2005 .

[45]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[46]  Dianne Jamieson-Noel,et al.  Self-regulating studying by objectives for learning: Students’ reports compared to a model , 2003 .

[47]  R. MacCoun.  Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, by William R. Shadish, Thomas D. Cook, and Donald T. Campbell. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001, 623 pp., $65.56. , 2003 .

[48]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement , 2002 .

[49]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[50]  B. Zimmerman.  Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview , 2002 .

[51]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[52]  B. Zimmerman.  Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis , 2001 .

[53]  B. Zimmerman.  Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[54]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[55]  P. Pintrich.  The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[56]  Markku Niemivirta,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning: Finding a Balance between Learning Goals and Ego-Protective Goals , 2000 .

[57]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[58]  R. Nelson-Gray,et al.  An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment. , 1999 .

[59]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Metacognition in educational theory and practice. , 1998 .

[60]  M. Boekaerts.  SELF-REGULATED LEARNING: A NEW CONCEPT EMBRACED BY RESEARCHERS, POLICY MAKERS, EDUCATORS, TEACHERS, AND STUDENTS , 1997 .

[61]  William Y. Lan,et al.  The effects of self-monitoring on students' course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-judgment ability, and knowledge representation , 1996 .

[62]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation , 1994 .

[63]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[64]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[65]  Jo Webber,et al.  Research on Self-Monitoring as a Behavior Management Technique in Special Education Classrooms , 1993 .

[66]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Development of a Structured Interview for Assessing Student Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies , 1986 .