Online Reviews or Marketer Information? An Eye-Tracking Study on Social Commerce Consumers

Driven by the increasing popularity of social commerce sites, this study seeks to examine the information sources and formats that influence consumer intentions to purchase. Specifically, we build on uses and gratifications theory and dual-process theory to determine how user-generated content and marketer-generated content are consumed by users when making a purchase decision. Using an eye-tracking approach on a popular social commerce site with a sample of 23 consumers, we find significant differences in the types of information used for product purchase compared to those omitted. Our study demonstrates that the format and source of information that consumers utilize, as well as the gaze transitions they make between different types of content when browsing, follow different patterns depending on if a product is bought or rejected. We conclude the paper summarizing the findings and drawing theoretical and practical implications that arise.

[1]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  A. Wildt,et al.  Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study , 1994 .

[3]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Value Co-Creation and Trust in Social Commerce: an fsQCA Approach , 2017, ECIS.

[4]  Moez Limayem,et al.  Predicting the continued use of Internet-based learning technologies: the role of habit , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[5]  K. Pauwels,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site , 2009 .

[6]  M. Bruhn,et al.  Are social media replacing traditional media in terms of brand equity creation , 2012 .

[7]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Shopping and Word-of-Mouth Intentions on Social Media , 2013, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[8]  Dimple R. Thadani,et al.  The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Minjeong Kim,et al.  The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective , 2014 .

[10]  Raffaele Filieri.  What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM , 2015 .

[11]  John D. Wells,et al.  WHAT SIGNAL ARE YOU SENDING ? HOW WEBSITE QUALITY INFLUENCES PERCEPTIONS OF PRODUCT QUALITY AND PURCHASE INTENTIONS 1 , 2011 .

[12]  Jie Jennifer Zhang,et al.  Social Media and Firm Equity Value , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Lefa Teng,et al.  The effect of online information sources on purchase intentions between consumers with high and low susceptibility to informational influence , 2016 .

[14]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  INTERNET USES AND GRATIFICATIONS: A Structural Equation Model of Interactive Advertising , 2005 .

[15]  L. Men,et al.  Consumer engagement with brands on social network sites: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the USA , 2017 .

[16]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Exploring the Business Potential of Social Media: An Utilitarian and Hedonic Motivation Approach , 2012, Bled eConference.

[17]  Hans-Dieter Zimmermann,et al.  Social commerce research: An integrated view , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[18]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Value co-creation and purchase intention in social commerce: The enabling role of word-of-mouth and trust , 2017, AMCIS.

[19]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential , 2013 .

[20]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding customers' repeat purchase intentions in B2C e‐commerce: the roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  V. Dhar,et al.  Does Chatter Matter? The Impact of User-Generated Content on Music Sales , 2007 .

[22]  H. Cheong,et al.  Consumers’ Reliance on Product Information and Recommendations Found in UGC , 2008 .

[23]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Deriving Value from Social Commerce Networks , 2009 .

[24]  Ruth E. Hartley,et al.  An integrated view. , 1973 .

[25]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change , 1982 .

[26]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities , 2008, Internet Res..

[27]  Yue Pan,et al.  Born Unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Reviews , 2011 .

[28]  Jengchung V. Chen,et al.  The effect of variations in banner ad, type of product, website context, and language of advertising on Internet users' attitudes , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Huaping Chen,et al.  Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[30]  A. Fiore,et al.  Influences of online store perception, shopping enjoyment, and shopping involvement on consumer patronage behavior towards an online retailer☆ , 2007 .

[31]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Consumer Intentions on Social Media: A fsQCA Analysis of Motivations , 2016, I3E.

[32]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Trusting expert- versus user-generated ratings online: The role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[34]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Mitigating risk in ecommerce transactions: perceptions of information credibility and the role of user-generated ratings in product quality and purchase intention , 2014, Electron. Commer. Res..