A Lifecycle-enhanced Global Manufacturing Platform for Enterprises

Abstract A growing interest toward the adoption of a lifecycle perspective in product design is characterizing current industrial trends. The cooperation of global manufacturing actors is fundamental to retrieve information from each lifecycle stage. From this background, a lifecycle based platform is proposed to efficiently set up feasible design configurations by including global manufacturing information. Starting from a set of input parameters, the idea is to collect lifecycle information in a customized XML structure in order to draw up the environmental profile. Such platform can also be adopted as an organized “knowledge repository” enhancing information sharing among the global manufacturing network.

[1]  Robert I. M. Young,et al.  Reference ontologies to support the development of global production network systems , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[2]  Carlo Vezzoli,et al.  Life Cycle Design: from general methods to product type specific guidelines and checklists: a method adopted to develop a set of guidelines/checklist handbook for the eco-efficient design of NECTA vending machines , 2006 .

[3]  Gomez Navarro,et al.  ECODESIGN FUNCTION AND FORM – CLASSIFICATION OF ECODESIGN TOOLS ACCORDING TO THEIR FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS , 2005 .

[4]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[5]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  Rüdiger Hoffmann,et al.  Application of Life Cycle Assessment for the Environmental Certificate of the Mercedes-Benz S-Class (7 pp) , 2006 .

[7]  Ann Vereecke,et al.  Delayering the Global Production Network into Congruent Subnetworks , 2016 .

[8]  Parisa Ghodous,et al.  Digital factory system for dynamic manufacturing network supporting networked collaborative product development , 2016, Data Knowl. Eng..

[9]  Marco Marconi,et al.  A bridge between CAD and LCA to optimise the life cycle inventory phase , 2016 .

[10]  Milton Borsato,et al.  Bridging the gap between product lifecycle management and sustainability in manufacturing through ontology building , 2014, Comput. Ind..

[11]  Gisela Lanza,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of global manufacturing networks taking into account multi-dimensional uncertainty , 2014 .

[12]  Valérie Botta-Genoulaz,et al.  A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  Frank Teuteberg,et al.  Understanding the Success Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Empirical Evidence from the Electrics and Electronics Industry , 2012 .

[14]  Michele Germani,et al.  A System to Increase the Sustainability and Traceability of Supply Chains , 2015 .

[15]  Vijay Srinivasan,et al.  An integration framework for product lifecycle management , 2011, Comput. Aided Des..

[16]  Esa Kunnari,et al.  Environmental evaluation of new technology: printed electronics case study , 2009 .

[17]  Damien Trentesaux,et al.  Sustainability in manufacturing operations scheduling: A state of the art review , 2015 .

[18]  Günther Schuh,et al.  An Evolutionary Approach for Global Production Network Optimisation , 2012 .

[19]  María D. Bovea,et al.  A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process , 2012 .

[20]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Why Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Management Should Have No Future , 2014 .

[21]  Mike Kagioglou,et al.  Towards distributed product data sharing environments — Progress so far and future challenges , 2007 .