Engaging Cervical Spinal Cord Networks to Reenable Volitional Control of Hand Function in Tetraplegic Patients

Background. Paralysis of the upper limbs from spinal cord injury results in an enormous loss of independence in an individual’s daily life. Meaningful improvement in hand function is rare after 1 year of tetraparesis. Therapeutic developments that result in even modest gains in hand volitional function will significantly affect the quality of life for patients afflicted with high cervical injury. The ability to neuromodulate the lumbosacral spinal circuitry via epidural stimulation in regaining postural function and volitional control of the legs has been recently shown. A key question is whether a similar neuromodulatory strategy can be used to improve volitional motor control of the upper limbs, that is, performance of motor tasks considered to be less “automatic” than posture and locomotion. In this study, the effects of cervical epidural stimulation on hand function are characterized in subjects with chronic cervical cord injury. Objective. Herein we show that epidural stimulation can be applied to the chronic injured human cervical spinal cord to promote volitional hand function. Methods and Results. Two subjects implanted with a cervical epidural electrode array demonstrated improved hand strength (approximately 3-fold) and volitional hand control in the presence of epidural stimulation. Conclusions. The present data are sufficient to suggest that hand motor function in individuals with chronic tetraplegia can be improved with cervical cord neuromodulation and thus should be comprehensively explored as a possible clinical intervention.

[1]  Majid Sarrafzadeh,et al.  MARHS: mobility assessment system with remote healthcare functionality for movement disorders , 2012, IHI '12.

[2]  Jan Holsheimer,et al.  New Trends in Neuromodulation for the Management of Neuropathic Pain , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[3]  S. Sisto,et al.  Spinal electro-magnetic stimulation combined with transgene delivery of neurotrophin NT-3 and exercise: novel combination therapy for spinal contusion injury. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  S. Harkema,et al.  Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  R Thorsen,et al.  Correlation among lesion level, muscle strength and hand function in cervical spinal cord injury. , 2014, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  Adam R Ferguson,et al.  Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis. , 2015, Journal of neurotrauma.

[7]  I Gelernter,et al.  The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international study , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  M. Dimitrijevic,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation for the control of spasticity in patients with chronic spinal cord injury: II. Neurophysiologic observations. , 1986, Central nervous system trauma : journal of the American Paralysis Association.

[9]  M. S. Read,et al.  United States (US) multi-center study to assess the validity and reliability of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) , 2011, Spinal Cord.

[10]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[11]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Pharmacological aids to locomotor training after spinal injury in the cat , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  W. Donovan,et al.  International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord Injury , 2003, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[13]  R. Marino,et al.  Reliability and Repeatability of the Motor and Sensory Examination of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 2008, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[14]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Christie K. Ferreira,et al.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study , 2011, The Lancet.

[16]  B. Leiby,et al.  Upper- and lower-extremity motor recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: an update from the national spinal cord injury database. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Dimitrijevic,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation for the control of spasticity in patients with chronic spinal cord injury: I. Clinical observations. , 1986, Central nervous system trauma : journal of the American Paralysis Association.

[18]  R. Jafari,et al.  CMAS: Clinical movement assessment system for neuromotor disorders , 2006, 2006 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference.

[19]  Kevin L Kilgore,et al.  Implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring arm and hand function in people with high level tetraplegia. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Marom Bikson,et al.  58 Trans-Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Immediately Modifies Motor Cortex Sensorimotor Maps , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[21]  V. Reggie Edgerton,et al.  Evaluation of optimal electrode configurations for epidural spinal cord stimulation in cervical spinal cord injured rats , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  Andrei Krassioukov,et al.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[23]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[24]  Daniel Graves,et al.  2009 Review and Revisions of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 2010, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[25]  S. Harkema,et al.  Retraining the injured spinal cord , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  K. Anderson Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[27]  Milan R Dimitrijevic,et al.  Clinical elements for the neuromuscular stimulation and functional electrical stimulation protocols in the practice of neurorehabilitation. , 2002, Artificial organs.

[28]  Majid Sarrafzadeh,et al.  Utilization of a novel digital measurement tool for quantitative assessment of upper extremity motor dexterity: a controlled pilot study , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[29]  G. Snoek,et al.  Use of the NESS Handmaster to restore handfunction in tetraplegia: clinical experiences in ten patients , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[30]  A. Jackson,et al.  Recovery of upper-extremity strength in complete and incomplete tetraplegia: a multicenter study. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Igor A. Lavrov,et al.  Epidural Stimulation Induced Modulation of Spinal Locomotor Networks in Adult Spinal Rats , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Prochazka,et al.  In-Home Tele-Rehabilitation Improves Tetraplegic Hand Function , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[33]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis , 2006 .

[34]  P. Peckham,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation for neuromuscular applications. , 2005, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[35]  V. Reggie Edgerton,et al.  Iron ‘ElectriRx’ man: Overground stepping in an exoskeleton combined with noninvasive spinal cord stimulation after paralysis , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).