Theoretic insights on the nature of performance synergies in human resource systems: Toward greater precision

Abstract Synergy is a central tenet of the organizational level approach to human resource management (HRM). However, current theoretic treatments of synergy in the HRM literature are too inspecific to offer much insight about its essential characteristics in HRM systems. To move the treatment of synergy toward greater precision, this paper describes three different theoretic approaches to synergy in HRM systems: virtuous overlaps, independent effects, and efficient complementarities. Each of these approaches to synergy is better fitted to some contingencies than to others and is operationalized by different methodologies. Recognizing these different varieties of HRM system synergy allows researchers to better understand and estimate the impact of HRM systems on organizational performance. Moreover, the theoretic perspectives on synergy described here apply to many types of systems beyond HRM.

[1]  S. Snell,et al.  Integrated Manufacturing and Human Resource Management: A Human Capital Perspective , 1992 .

[2]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research , 2005 .

[3]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Horizontal and vertical fit in human resource systems. , 2007 .

[4]  Glenn M. McEvoy,et al.  Human Resource Management, TQM, and Firm Performance in Small and Medium-Size Enterprises , 2000 .

[5]  Neil Conway,et al.  Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK , 2003 .

[6]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[7]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[8]  John Paul Macduffie Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[9]  S. Athey,et al.  An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories About Complimentarity in Organizational Design , 1998 .

[10]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[11]  T. Judge,et al.  Interviewers' perceptions of persons-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Allan M. Mohrman,et al.  Doing research that makes a difference , 1985 .

[13]  R. Schroeder,et al.  The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences , 2003 .

[14]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Economics, Organization and Management , 1992 .

[15]  Mitsuru Wakabayashi,et al.  The Strategic HRM Configuration for Competitive Advantage: Evidence from Japanese Firms in China and Taiwan , 2003 .

[16]  Sean A. Way High Performance Work Systems and Intermediate Indicators of Firm Performance Within the US Small Business Sector , 2002 .

[17]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here? , 2006 .

[18]  Alvaro López-Cabrales,et al.  The contribution of core employees to organizational capabilities and efficiency , 2006 .

[19]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[20]  Jan W. Rivkin Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[21]  John E. Delery Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: Implications for research , 1998 .

[22]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[23]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[24]  L. Dyer,et al.  Human resource strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go? , 1995 .

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[26]  N. Venkatraman Performance Implications Of Strategic Coalignment: A Methodological Perspective , 1990 .

[27]  Keld Laursen,et al.  New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance , 2003 .

[28]  James G. Combs,et al.  HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[29]  Clint Chadwick,et al.  Examining Non-Linear Relationships between Human Resource Practices and Manufacturing Performance , 2007 .

[30]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[31]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  IMPROVING LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES DO MATTER , 1996 .

[32]  John Roufagalas,et al.  HRM systems architecture and firm performance: Evidence from SMEs in a developing country , 2006 .

[33]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  HR as a Source of Shareholder Value: Research and Recommendations , 1997 .

[34]  Keld Laursen,et al.  The Importance of Sectoral Differences in the Application of Complementary HRM Practices for Innovation Performance , 2002 .

[35]  S. Jackson,et al.  Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Management Practices , 1987 .

[36]  Mark A. Huselid The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[37]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance , 1996 .

[38]  J. Godard A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm , 2004 .

[39]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study , 1999 .

[40]  P. D. Hall,et al.  The Management Factor in Acquisition Performance , 1987 .

[41]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[42]  S. Davis,et al.  Matching corporate culture and business strategy , 1981 .

[43]  Sylvie Guerrero,et al.  High-involvement practices and performance of French firms , 2004 .

[44]  Peter Cappelli The National Employer Survey: Employer Data on Employment Practices , 2001 .

[45]  C. B. Schoonhoven Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[46]  Philip H. Mirvis,et al.  The Human Side of Merger Planning: Assessing and Analyzing "Fit." , 1992 .

[47]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms , 2005 .

[48]  Don Hellriegel,et al.  Critical Contingencies in Joint Venture Management: Some Lessons from Managers , 1994 .

[49]  Glen D. Murphy,et al.  High performance work practices: Perceived determinants of adoption and the role of the HR practitioner , 2003 .

[50]  James N. Baron,et al.  Strategic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers , 1999 .

[51]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Perspectives on organizational fit , 2007 .

[52]  N. Johnson,et al.  High Performance Work Practices and Human Resource Management Effectiveness: Substitutes Or Complements? , 2004, Journal of Business Strategies.

[53]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Change in the Presence of Fit: the Rise, the Fall, and the Renaissance of Liz Claiborne , 2001 .

[54]  Walter D. Davis,et al.  Journal of Management High-performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: the Mediating Role of Internal on Behalf Of: Southern Management Association , 2005 .

[55]  Christopher G. Gresov Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. , 1989 .

[56]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER , 2005 .

[57]  Rosemary L. Batt,et al.  MANAGING CUSTOMER SERVICES: HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, QUIT RATES, AND SALES GROWTH , 2002 .

[58]  Robert M. Verburg,et al.  Configurations of human resource management practices: a model and test of internal fit , 2007 .

[59]  Terry C. Blum,et al.  Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance , 2000 .

[60]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Environment, Structure, and Consensus in Strategy Formulation: A Conceptual Integration , 1987 .

[61]  Toby D. Wall,et al.  The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science , 2005 .

[62]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Toward a Unifying Framework for Exploring Fit and Flexibility in Strategic Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[63]  Scott A. Snell,et al.  Human Resource Configurations, Intellectual Capital, and Organizational Performance. , 2004 .

[64]  Neil Conway,et al.  Using sequential tree analysis to search for ‘bundles’ of HR practices , 2004 .

[65]  Peter Mühlau,et al.  Human resource systems and employee performance in Ireland and the Netherlands: a test of the complementarity hypothesis , 2006 .

[66]  S. Snell Control Theory In Strategic Human Resource Management: The Mediating Effect Of Administrative Information , 1992 .

[67]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[68]  Lloyd Baird,et al.  Managing Two Fits of Strategic Human Resource Management , 1988 .

[69]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[70]  E. Lazear,et al.  Peer Pressure and Partnerships , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[71]  Stephen Wood,et al.  The reality of flexible work systems in Britain , 2006 .

[72]  K. Rondeau,et al.  Retaining Employees in Small and Medium-Sized Firms: Examining the Link with Human Resource Management , 2006 .

[73]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Doing Research That Is Useful for Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[74]  M. Sheehan,et al.  Business strategy, human resources, labour market flexibility and competitive advantage , 2005 .

[75]  K. Macky,et al.  The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction effects , 2007 .

[76]  J. Arthur The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills , 1992 .

[77]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  Prototypes and strategy: assigning causal credit using fuzzy sets , 2004 .

[78]  Stephen Wood,et al.  Getting the Measure of the Transformed High-Performance Organization , 1999 .

[79]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[80]  P. Boxall,et al.  Strategy and Human Resource Management , 2002 .

[81]  Mary E. Graham,et al.  New Directions in Compensation Research: Synergies, Risk, and Survival , 1995 .