The inherent problem of pooling: increased false-negative rates

Background: Pooling is a popular strategy for increasing SARS-CoV-2 testing throughput. A common pooling scheme is Dorfman pooling: test N individuals simultaneously. If the first test is positive - retest each individual. Methods: Using a probabilistic model, we analyze the false-negative rate (i.e., the probability of a negative result for an infected individual) of Dorfman pooling. Our model is conservative in that it ignores sample dilution effects, which can only worsen pooling performance. Results: We show that one can expect a 60-80% increase in false-negative rates under Dorfman pooling, for reasonable parameter values. On average, when separate testing misses, e.g., ten infected individuals - Dorfman pooling misses more than sixteen. Discussion: In most pooling schemes, identifying an infected individual requires positive results in multiple tests and hence substantially increases false-negative rates. It is an inherent shortcoming of pooling schemes and should be kept in mind by policy makers.

[1]  M. Yassour,et al.  Lessons from applied large-scale pooling of 133,816 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests , 2020, Science Translational Medicine.

[2]  Yael Mandel-Gutfreund,et al.  Evaluation of COVID-19 RT-qPCR test in multi-sample pools , 2020, medRxiv.

[3]  Rodrigo Noriega,et al.  Increasing testing throughput and case detection with a pooled-sample Bayesian approach in the context of COVID-19 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  K. Bentele,et al.  Pooling of coronavirus tests under unknown prevalence , 2020, Epidemiology and Infection.

[5]  Jose Lourenco,et al.  Estimating false-negative detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR , 2020, medRxiv.

[6]  S. Lohse,et al.  Pooling of samples for testing for SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic people , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[7]  Stefan Thurner,et al.  Boosting test-efficiency by pooled testing strategies for SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, 2003.09944.

[8]  N. Padhye Reconstructed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the RT-PCR test for COVID-19 , 2020, medRxiv.

[9]  A. Sterrett On the Detection of Defective Members of Large Populations , 1957 .

[10]  P. Kotanko,et al.  Simulation of Pool Testing to Identify Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Under Conditions of Limited Test Availability , 2020, JAMA network open.

[11]  P. Whiting,et al.  Interpreting a covid-19 test result , 2020, BMJ.

[12]  L. Kucirka,et al.  Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure , 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  False Negative Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Infection - Challenges and Implications. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Reusken,et al.  Comparison of seven commercial RT-PCR diagnostic kits for COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Clinical Virology.